recent bookmarks

S3 trickery, using it as a scheduler – Hacker Noon
GitHub is where people build software. More than 28 million people use GitHub to discover, fork, and contribute to over 85 million projects.
aws  lambda  s3  python 
1 minute ago by arthuralvim
Doug Jones (@SenDougJones)
Tomorrow, 9/21, my team will hold events in Bham & Mobile as a part of @bidencancer’s #BidenCancerSummit. These events have speakers Dr. @mattmight – a leader in precision medicine – @ the Bham event & state Senator Vivian Figures @ our Mobile summit. Hope y’all can make it!
US  Senators  Twitter 
1 minute ago by AlexanderERyzhov
Cambridge Bibles
The quality of any Bible depends primarily on the materials and the processes used in manufacture, as well as on the more immediately apparent factors such as text design and layout. The following guide offers some pointers for prospective customers considering the purchase of a fine Bible.
Can you always judge a good book by its cover?

Not necessarily – first impressions may be misleading! Bibles come in a variety of cover styles and materials, but the range of options available for a particular edition almost always share a common printed book block – the pages inside the book’s cover – and the true measure of quality therefore begins with an assessment of the text design and the paper and print quality. One sometimes sees high-quality supple leather covers wrapped round an inferior book block, the quality of which is better suited to a basic and inexpensive mechanical binding style. Conversely, in the Cambridge list even the basic hardback Bibles have similar quality features – design, paper, print quality, sewn bindings – to the fine-bound styles of the same edition.
Consider the essential elements of the book, from the inside out …

The Bible publisher’s first challenge has always been to present, within the covers of a single ‘book’, a large amount of text – more than three-quarters of a million words in the Old and New Testaments alone, equivalent to half a dozen or more novels. Traditionally this has been accomplished by printing on very thin paper using carefully chosen typefaces and type sizes, and cleverly designed page layouts. The printed page should be easy to read, but a small format Bible cannot be printed in a large typeface without increasing the number of pages and consequently the thickness of the book, so designers strive to find the optimum balance between readability and portability. The outer margins should be even, and in the centre of the book the ‘gutter’ margins should be sufficiently generous so as not to interfere with reading.
The Type

There are many variations in the styles and characteristics of typefaces or ‘fonts’ available to the designer. In order to be economical in the space it occupies and at the same time easy to read in small sizes, the font needs to be what was traditionally described as ‘large on the body’: the central part of the letter should be generously proportioned with modestly sized ascenders and descenders (e.g. the upward stroke of h and the downward stroke of p). A thin, spidery or condensed type may prove tiring to the eye, but one with over-thick strokes will make the page look too dark. Fussy or unusual letter forms may distract or irritate the reader.

Note that point size is not a universal measurement, nor is any specific point size in itself a guarantee of readability. Each font has its own characteristics, and an 8 point type in one font may well be considered just as legible as a 9 or 10 point in another. The amount of ‘leading’ between the lines, the length of the text line, and whether the text prints ‘line on line’ (see ‘Printing’) are all factors that may contribute significantly to readability.

The typefaces chosen for Cambridge Bibles have been selected to provide the most legible and attractive appearance for the particular style and size of each edition. Cambridge editions fall into two categories: traditional settings created in the days of hot-metal composition, and modern settings created using digital fonts selected to replicate the best characteristics of the familiar metal Bible typefaces. In effect, the older KJV settings such as the Concord, Pitt Minion, or Cameo Reference are ‘facsimiles’ of the original editions created many years ago.

Because of their length, Bibles have to be printed on very thin paper in order to achieve a suitably compact book. Nevertheless, irrespective of how thick or thin it is, paper in a Bible should have sufficient strength to sustain the usage it will receive. The best Bibles are printed on papers which are not only much thinner and finer than ordinary book papers, but which are also strong and have sufficient opacity to minimise ‘show-through’ from printing on the reverse side. Paper of 30gsm or less in weight – ‘20lb paper' in the US – is usually described as ‘India paper’ and over 30gsm as ‘Bible paper’.

Cambridge Bibles are printed on high-quality lightweight paper, chosen to achieve the optimum readability for the minimum bulk. Various factors – strength, thinness and opacity, and aesthetic qualities – are considered in sourcing appropriate papers that meet internationally recognised environmental standards.

Some Cambridge reference Bibles have wide margins, so that users can make notes against the Bible text. The paper used in these Bibles is chosen for its superior resilience and its capacity to absorb handwritten notes. Nevertheless, it is advisable to test pens and pencils on the paper before making extensive notes, to ensure that the ink flow is not so great as to bleed through the paper. Making notes in standard Bibles without wide margins is not recommended.

The appearance of the printed page is a good indication of the quality of both the printing and the paper. The position of the type on the page and the width of the margins should be consistent throughout. All letters should be sharp and clear and the inking should be even and uniform on all pages. In red-letter Bibles the register (the relative position of the red and black type on the page) should be accurate and consistent.

The best Bibles are designed to be printed ‘line on line’ (when one line exactly matches the position of a line of text on the reverse side of the paper) and have minimal show-through, even when printing on the thinnest papers.

Accuracy in printing fine Bibles is best achieved when the presses are run at slower speeds than is usual for mass-market Bibles or books, but this extra care inevitably has an implication for pricing. There are differences applicable to different Bible editions even within the Cambridge list, but generally Cambridge Bibles are printed on presses running more slowly and therefore more accurately, than the norm.
2 minutes ago by wardell
Streaming data with Amazon Kinesis - Sqreen Blog | Modern Application Security
Learn how Sqreen uses use Amazon Kinesis to process and stream security data from its agent in near real-time.
kinesis  python 
3 minutes ago by arthuralvim
мы наш, мы новый: mi3ch
Есть безошибочный маркер, показывающий, что тотальная российская пропаганда действует на вас – использование местоимения «наш» для описания политической ситуации в современной России:
На НАС наложил санкции Запад
НАШИ разведчики провалились в Солсбери
НАШИ добровольцы на Донбассе
НАШИ союзники НАШЕЙ ракетой сбили НАШ самолет

В это местоимение Геббельс-ТВ вложило миллиарды.
Используя его применительно к политике, вы отождествляете себя с преступным режимом, узурпирующим власть в стране. Не надо так делать. Не ВЫ развязали войну с Украиной, не ВЫ посылаете убийц в Европу, не ВЫ поддерживаете людоеда Асада.

Говоря НАШ вы кого имеете в виду? Узурпатора и преступника Путина? Его телохранителя Золотова? Сердюкова? Васильеву? Кабаеву? Соловьева? Гундяева? Петрова и Боширова? Бастрыкина? Кадырова? Омон, избивающий мирную демонстрацию? ФСИН, пытающий людей? Полицию, фальсифицирующую уголовные дела или судей, сажающих за лайки и репосты? Уточните, пожалуйста

Пусть вас не завораживают мифические цифры поддержки режима – это ложь. Цена им примерно такая же, как горячему одобрению всего советского народа мудрой политики партии и правительства, за которую на всех выборах голосовало 99,98% всех избирателей. Цена им примерно такая же, как небывало высокому рейтингу Чаушеску за неделю до его свержения. Хватит одного месяца независимого телевизионного вещания на центральных каналах, чтобы от этого рейтинга не осталось ничего. Достаточно даже одних дебатов в прямом эфире между президентом и оппозицией.
russian  government  propaganda  society 
3 minutes ago by some_hren
« earlier      

Copy this bookmark:



Copy this bookmark: