RT @LarsKnoll: Update on open governance: Qt Project going live soon:

malfu

"Device is malfunctioning, you may try re-flashing blah blah Software problem (unknown): too frequent reboots"

RT @qtbynokia: Bigger isn’t always better: Nokia Ovi Store apps downloaded 160% more than iOS apps via @BGR

The #N9 UI is exceptionally good and is powered by @qtbynokia

The #NokiaN9 seems to have an awesome product design and the UI looks good as well. Finally back on track?

@xavezbe you'll like this:

Thank you very much, @qtbynokia, for the #Qt Ambassador package with a #Nokia C7 Symbian^3 phone!

The #Qt Blog - Nokia new strategic direction. What is the future for Qt?

An amazing screed on the slow death-march of Nokia and Symbian:

Commercial entities have no advantage in releasing concept products the likes of which they hope to subsequently sell. If the conceptual piece truthfully captures their “best” it can only tell their competitors how advanced they are and where they fall short. If it camouflages their true capabilities in an effort to mislead their competitors, then what value is it to others? In fact, the intention to mislead competitors is really the only effective reason for a commercial entity to publicly release concept products.

Apple would gain nothing from telegraphing its intentions and capabilities by releasing public conceptual products. The company is being more than prudent by not displaying their unconstrained fantasies to competitors, media, investors or customers.

As counterintuitive as it may seem, this inexorably leads us to Kontra’s law:

A commercial company’s ability to innovate is inversely proportional to its proclivity to publicly release conceptual products.

Yay! :)