rybesh + publishing   20

Photo histogram in CoffeeKup — Smooth CoffeeScript
This literate program is interactive in its HTML5 form. Edit a CoffeeScript segment to try it. You can see the generated JavaScript as you modify a CoffeeScript function by typing ‘show name’ after its definition.
coffeescript  education  publishing  interactive 
8 weeks ago by rybesh
DITA For Publishers | Free software downloads at SourceForge.net
Provides general-purpose DITA map, topic, and domain specializations for the Publishing industry, as well as supporting processors (e.g., DITA Open Toolkit plugins).
publishing  xml  tools 
8 weeks ago by rybesh
Author Rights: Using the SPARC Author Addendum to secure your rights as the author of a journal article (SPARC)
The SPARC Author Addendum is a legal instrument that modifies the publisher’s agreement and allows you to keep key rights to your articles. The Author Addendum is a free resource developed by SPARC in partnership with Creative Commons <http://www.creativecommons.org> and Science Commons <http://science.creativecommons.org>, established non-profit organizations that offer a range of copyright options for many different creative endeavors.
authors  copyright  publishing  academia  authoring  authorship  openaccess 
11 weeks ago by rybesh
Interactive Smooth CoffeeScript
Discover the beauty of functional programming in Coffeescript. The source of this book is a literate markdown program/document which produces this code: CoffeeScript, that translates into JavaScript and produces this output.
coffeescript  functional  programming  tutorial  publishing  authoring  markdown 
february 2012 by rybesh
A New Part of Your Digital Humanities Toolkit | Tapas Project
Tapas is the TEI Archival Publishing and Access Service for scholars and other creators of TEI data who need a place to publish their materials in different forms and ensure it remains accessible over time. Tapas is also for anyone interested in reading and exploring TEI data, and communicating with those that share that interest.
tei  publishing  digitalhumanities 
january 2012 by rybesh
johnsensible/django-sendfile - GitHub
This is a wrapper around web-server specific methods for sending files to web clients. This is useful when Django needs to check permissions associated files, but does not want to serve the actual bytes of the file itself. i.e. as serving large files is not what Django is made for.
django  publishing 
november 2011 by rybesh
schacon/git-scribe - GitHub
The git-scribe tool is a simple command line toolset to help you use Git, GitHub and Asciidoc to write e-books. This provides tools for setting up the structure, collaborating with co-authors, doing technical and copy-editing, handling translations, taking errata, as well as publishing online, pdf, mobi (Kindle) and epub (iBooks, Nook) versions.
books  git  publishing  writing  authoring  collaboration 
november 2011 by rybesh
Hakyll - Home
Hakyll is a Haskell library for generating static sites, mostly aimed at small-to-medium sites and personal blogs. It is written in a very configurable way and uses an xmonad-like DSL for configuration.
haskell  publishing 
april 2011 by rybesh
FigShare
Scientific publishing as it stands is an inefficient way to do science on a global scale. A lot of time and money is being wasted by groups around the world duplicating research that has already been carried out. FigShare allows you to share all of your data, negative results and unpublished figures. In doing this, other researchers will not duplicate the work, but instead may publish with your previously wasted figures, or offer collaboration opportunities and feedback on preprint figures.
datasharing  research  publishing  science  opendata 
april 2011 by rybesh
Beyond the PDF
The goal of the workshop was not to produce a white paper! Rather it was to identify a set of requirements, and a group of willing participants to develop a mandate, open source code and a set of deliverables to be used by scholars to accelerate data and knowledge sharing and discovery . Our starting point, and the only prerequisite to participating, was the belief that we need to move Beyond the PDF (meant to capture a common philosophy, not necessarily to be taken literally).

In a heady moment we might also describe our efforts as the desire to contribute to the development of a free and open digital printing press for the 21st century. A platform, when utilized, moves us beyond a static and disparate data and knowledge representation to a rich integrated content which grows and changes the more we learn. A system (content plus platform) from which a scholar can interact and once evaluated shows improved understanding and interest.
publishing  data  scholarship  tools  KR 
january 2011 by rybesh
Pointer Methods in RDF
This specification contains a framework for representing pointers - entities that permit identifying a portion or segment of a piece of content - making use of the Resource Description Framework (RDF). It will also describe a number of specific types of pointers that permit portions of a document to be referred to in different ways.
rdf  annotation  publishing  vocabulary  media  web  standards  semweb 
april 2009 by rybesh
Thesis in a Box
Thesis in a Box is a LaTeX/PDF framework for easily formatting a doctoral dissertation that obeys the formatting requirements of the University of California, Berkeley.
latex  publishing  tools  berkeley  dissertation 
november 2008 by rybesh
ucthesis latex style
This is a "very quick start guide" for writing dissertations with the ucthesis.cls LaTeX style file.
latex  publishing  berkeley  dissertation 
november 2008 by rybesh
AtomServer
AtomServer is a generic data store implemented as a REST-ful web service. It is designed as a GData-style Atom Store.
atom  java  database  webservices  publishing  platform 
july 2008 by rybesh
Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies
This document describes best practice recipes for publishing vocabularies or ontologies on the Web (in RDF Schema or OWL).
semweb  rdf  ontology  publishing  howto 
may 2008 by rybesh
Boycott? I think not.
I fully support open-access scholarship, but find danah boyd's recent post on boycotting "locked-down" journals naive at best, and offensive at worst.First of all, I think she overstates the "lock-down." I've published articles with Sage and Taylor&Francis, and was able to publish almost identical draft versions here. All I did was hand-write that provision onto my contract before I signed it, and no one ever objected. And while I agree that there is some sort of "black market" economy for exchanging articles, I'm willing to accept this as a viable tactic against an over-arching publication for profit strategy. In my experience, one of the quickest ways to alienate people from your cause is to invalidate existing acts of resistance because they don't fit your model. That's just scientific positivism applied to personal politics, and I don't like playing the "my politics are better than your politics" game.This brings me to my main objection: danah's overall tone is so patronising to academics that I can't help but feel insulted. I mean, really, how do unsupported claims like this one - "If scholars are publishing for audiences of zero, no wonder no one respects them" - help our shared cause of reforming academic publishing?Danah's position disrespects years of scholarship and community, and it dismisses outright the possibility that an academic might find genuine pride, or satisfaction, or joy in such work. Surely good ethnographers would want to ask a scholar what she gets out of a given practice before they tell her, or speak for her? And as an early career academic, I was most unimpressed by being given the option of becoming a "punk" or "conservative" scholar:"Young punk scholars: Publish only in open-access journals in protest, especially if you're in a new field. This may cost you advancement or tenure, but you know it's the right thing to do...More conservative young scholars: publish what you need to get tenure and then stop publishing in closed venues immediately upon acquiring tenure. I understand why you feel the need to follow the rules. This is fine, but make a point by stopping this practice the moment you don't need it."What is this, high school? I honestly fail to see how this "open" model gives me any more space to manoeuvre as a scholar, or as a human being.In any case, Mel Gregg also takes issue with danah's "capacity to diagnose the pitfalls of an entire industry and the motivations of all of us who choose to work in it" and I appreciated Jason Wilson's comments on how journal publishing actually works. But since I also really like constructive criticism, and I haven't provided any alternatives here, I'll second Alex Halavais' suggestion:"If you want to find the Achilles heal, the catalyst that would get things moving much faster, it's easy enough: follow the money. Pressure NSF, MacArthur, etc., to require open publication for all funded research. Get state legislatures to do the same for state schools: if you get a summer grant or fellowship, your work needs to be published in public, so that the public who paid for it can access it."I encourage Canadian citizens and researchers to contact the following organisations to voice your opinions on these matters:SSHRC | NSERC | Killam TrustsResearchers can also apply for funding from the Government of Canada's Intellectual Property Mobilization Program (IPM).Canadian Intellectual Property Office | HRSDC Learning and Post-Secondary Education | Provincial Ministries of EducationAssociation of Universities and Colleges of Canada | Canadian Federation of Students
academia  publishing  from google
february 2008 by rybesh
OpenTextMining
Open Text Mining Interface (OTMI) is an initiative from Nature Publishing Group (NPG). It aims to enable scholarly publishers, among others, to disclose their full text for indexing and text-mining purposes but without giving it away in a form that is rea
academia  publishing  copyright  data  nlp  standards  datamining 
november 2007 by rybesh
Andrews McMeel Universal
For more than a quarter of a century, Andrews McMeel Universal and its divisions, Universal Press Syndicate, Andrews McMeel Publishing, LLC, uclick, and AMUSE, have helped define American popular culture.
pop  culture  syndication  business  publishing  cartoons  humor  news  newspaper 
march 2007 by rybesh
Common Ground - About
Common Ground has also become extensively involved in software development, built upon the Common Ground Markup Language (CGML).
publishing  authoring  code  tools  xml  language  p2p  collaboration 
march 2007 by rybesh

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: