rahuldave + productivity 15
musicForProgramming(): Focus-Boosting Mixtapes for Everybody [Work Sounds]
february 2012 by rahuldave
Web site musicForProgramming(); distributes a series of roughly hour-long ambient music mixes intended to "aid concentration and increase productivity" while you work. More »
Work_sounds
Music
Productivity
Top
Work_music
from google
february 2012 by rahuldave
Rethinking iPhone UI and getting things done with Clear to-do app
january 2012 by rahuldave
If managing your to-do lists is taking up more time and effort than you spend actually getting things done, a new iPhone app coming from developers Phill Ryu and Milen Dzhumerov, designer David Lanham, and publisher Realmac Software might be the perfect solution. Tossing most iPhone UI conventions out the window along with any religious adherence to GTD principles, the upcoming Clear app is designed to eliminate the friction and complexity of adhering to systems like GTD and be as easy to use as a paper list. We were able to meet up with the team at the 2012 Macworld|iWorld to check out the offerings.
Clear has no standard navigation bar at the top or tab bar at the bottom—common iPhone UI elements. Instead, the app is stripped down to the bare minimum, with a rectangular strip for each list item. Pull the list down from the top to add another item. Swipe right to mark the item completed. Swipe left to delete the item from your list. Pinch to access a list of lists—you could keep a shopping list, a list of errands, and a list of projects, for example.
Read the comments on this post
News
News
Apple
appstore
design
ios
productivity
software
from google
Clear has no standard navigation bar at the top or tab bar at the bottom—common iPhone UI elements. Instead, the app is stripped down to the bare minimum, with a rectangular strip for each list item. Pull the list down from the top to add another item. Swipe right to mark the item completed. Swipe left to delete the item from your list. Pinch to access a list of lists—you could keep a shopping list, a list of errands, and a list of projects, for example.
Read the comments on this post
january 2012 by rahuldave
Calculate the Best Time to Nap with This Interactive Nap Wheel [Naps]
january 2012 by rahuldave
There's nothing like a power nap to restore energy and improve productivity. Now you can get the "ultimate" power nap by timing it precisely for when your body and mind may most need it, using this Take a Nap Nap Wheel. More »
naps
Energy
Napping
Productivity
Sleep
Top
from google
january 2012 by rahuldave
Project Management Tool Asana Unveils iPhone App for Collaboration on the Go [Ios Downloads]
december 2011 by rahuldave
iOS: Previously mentioned collaboration tool Asana made waves when it launched, but at the time it was missing support for mobile devices. Now, anyone with an iOS device can log in to their Asana account on the go, check in on their projects and activities, comment on tasks, and more. More »
Ios_downloads
Collaboration
Downloads
ios
iPhone_Downloads
News
Organization
Productivity
Projects
Tools
Top
from google
december 2011 by rahuldave
Use Your iPad or Android Tablet as a Second Monitor for Your Computer [Productivity]
december 2011 by rahuldave
iPad/Android: Want to eke out a little more value out of that tablet? Turn it into a second monitor for your PC or Mac and extend your screen real estate. This is especially handy for laptop users. More »
Productivity
Android
Downloads
Efficiency
ios
ipad
Monitors
Tablets
Top
Work
from google
december 2011 by rahuldave
Joshua Gans: Entrepreneurship and Inequality
november 2011 by rahuldave
Do you agree with this?:
Entrepreneurship and inequality, by Joshua Gans: So I was reading Felix Salmon’s account of a debate here in Toronto between Paul Krugman and Larry Summers. ... I was struck by this passage.
Summers also tried to defend inequality, at least in part, by saying that “suppose the United States had 30 more people like Steve Jobs” — that, he said, would be a good thing even as it increased inequality. “So we do need to recognize that a component of this inequality is the other side of successful entrepreneurship; that is surely something we want to encourage.”
Now there is nothing new in this view. It is an argument for inequality that reminds me of Ted Baxter (from the Mary Tyler Moore Show) who intended to have six children in the hope that one of them grows up to solve the population problem. The inequality version is that we accept inequality in the hopes of getting the fruits of entrepreneurship.
So no one disagrees with encouraging entrepreneurship. ... But when we link it to inequality in this way we are asking ... whether the poor (or middle class) are happy outsourcing knowledge creation and are each willing to pay a bit to see that happen.
Seen in this light, the problem of inequality is a design problem. This is something that Jean Tirole and Glen Weyl have recently investigated. They ask a related question: when is it a good idea to confer entrepreneurs with market power (as a reward)? The answer turns out to be, when the government does not know much about the nature of demand for innovative products. In this world, by exposing entrepreneurial rewards to what they can get through monopoly pricing, we screen for innovations that maximize the gap between innovative benefits and innovative costs. The implication here is that if we outsourced innovation to creative geniuses, we would do it in a way that allows them to charge high prices.
But does that carry over when there is real inequality? Let’s face it, the actual products Steve Jobs produced were not priced for the poor. The best we can say is that when they were imitated the poor received some benefits (which may also be arguable). So is it really the case that poorer people would be willing to be taxed more (by government or through monopoly pricing) in order to bring out more people like Steve Jobs? Instead, the Steve Jobs argument is surely one for a lateral wealth transfer from those with wealth — innovators or not — to be more concentrated amongst those who innovate. It is inequality in talent and skill and its mismatch to wealth that drives the argument not inequality in wealth.
It takes a village to make an iPad.
Economics
Market_Failure
Productivity
Technology
from google
Entrepreneurship and inequality, by Joshua Gans: So I was reading Felix Salmon’s account of a debate here in Toronto between Paul Krugman and Larry Summers. ... I was struck by this passage.
Summers also tried to defend inequality, at least in part, by saying that “suppose the United States had 30 more people like Steve Jobs” — that, he said, would be a good thing even as it increased inequality. “So we do need to recognize that a component of this inequality is the other side of successful entrepreneurship; that is surely something we want to encourage.”
Now there is nothing new in this view. It is an argument for inequality that reminds me of Ted Baxter (from the Mary Tyler Moore Show) who intended to have six children in the hope that one of them grows up to solve the population problem. The inequality version is that we accept inequality in the hopes of getting the fruits of entrepreneurship.
So no one disagrees with encouraging entrepreneurship. ... But when we link it to inequality in this way we are asking ... whether the poor (or middle class) are happy outsourcing knowledge creation and are each willing to pay a bit to see that happen.
Seen in this light, the problem of inequality is a design problem. This is something that Jean Tirole and Glen Weyl have recently investigated. They ask a related question: when is it a good idea to confer entrepreneurs with market power (as a reward)? The answer turns out to be, when the government does not know much about the nature of demand for innovative products. In this world, by exposing entrepreneurial rewards to what they can get through monopoly pricing, we screen for innovations that maximize the gap between innovative benefits and innovative costs. The implication here is that if we outsourced innovation to creative geniuses, we would do it in a way that allows them to charge high prices.
But does that carry over when there is real inequality? Let’s face it, the actual products Steve Jobs produced were not priced for the poor. The best we can say is that when they were imitated the poor received some benefits (which may also be arguable). So is it really the case that poorer people would be willing to be taxed more (by government or through monopoly pricing) in order to bring out more people like Steve Jobs? Instead, the Steve Jobs argument is surely one for a lateral wealth transfer from those with wealth — innovators or not — to be more concentrated amongst those who innovate. It is inequality in talent and skill and its mismatch to wealth that drives the argument not inequality in wealth.
It takes a village to make an iPad.
november 2011 by rahuldave
Sandglaz Is a Web-Based To-Do Manager That’s Part Day Planner, Part Calendar [Webapps]
november 2011 by rahuldave
There's no shortage of to-do managers and organizers on the web, but Sandglaz, a new webapp that combines the best things from a day planner and a calendar together into an easy-to-use webapp, really stands out. Adding to-dos, reordering them, and browsing your next actions are all easy operations that don't take a long tutorial to figure out. Sandglaz manages to be powerful and customizable without being difficult to use. More »
Webapps
Beta
Covey
GTD
News
Organization
Organizers
Productivity
Productivity_Tools
Quadrants
To-do_managers
To-Dos
Tools
from google
november 2011 by rahuldave
The Tag-It Approach to Productivity Gives You More Categories and Control Over Tasks [Productivity]
september 2011 by rahuldave
One of the nice things about productivity techniques like GTD is that they help you organize tasks based on how actionable, important, or quick to finish a given task is. The Tag-It Approach gives you more categories in which to drop your tasks, if you feel like you need more control over how they're organized. More »
Productivity
Getting_Things_Done
GTD
Organization
task_management
to-do_lists
from google
september 2011 by rahuldave
Personal organization software
april 2011 by rahuldave
I’ve tried various strategies and pieces of software for personal organization and haven’t been happy with most of them. I’ll briefly describe my criteria and what I’ve found.
My needs are fairly simple. I don’t need or want something that could scale to running a multinational corporation.
I’d like something with a portable, transparent data format. I don’t want the data stored in a hidden file or in a proprietary format. I’d like to be able to read the data without the software that was used to write it.
I’d like to be as structured or unstructured as I choose and not have to conform to a rigid database schema. I’d like to be able to do ad hoc queries as well as strongly typed queries.
I’d like something that exports to paper easily.
Here’s what I found: org-mode. It’s an Emacs mode for editing text files. It provides sophisticated functionality, but all the sophistication is in the software, not the data format. It’s more convenient to work with org-mode files in Emacs, but the raw file format is just a light-weight mark-down, easy for a person or a computer to parse.
When I went back to using Emacs a year ago after a 15-year hiatus, I heard good things about org-mode but didn’t understand what people liked about it. I heard it described as a to-do list manager and was not impressed. I’m not interested in the features I was first introduced to: tracking the status of to-do items and making agendas. I still don’t use those features. It took me a while to realize that org-mode was what I had been looking for. It was similar in spirit to something I’d thought about writing.
Emacs is an acquired taste. But someone who doesn’t use Emacs could get some good ideas from looking at org-mode. I imagine some people have borrowed its ideas and implemented them for other editors. If not, someone should.
The org-mode site has links to numerous introductions and tutorials. I like the FLOSS Weekly interview with org-mode’s creator Carsten Dominik. In it he explains his motivation for writing org-mode and gives a high-level overview of its features.
Related posts:
Giving Emacs another try
Forced to be simple
Not for everyone
Software that gets used
Uncategorized
Emacs
Productivity
from google
My needs are fairly simple. I don’t need or want something that could scale to running a multinational corporation.
I’d like something with a portable, transparent data format. I don’t want the data stored in a hidden file or in a proprietary format. I’d like to be able to read the data without the software that was used to write it.
I’d like to be as structured or unstructured as I choose and not have to conform to a rigid database schema. I’d like to be able to do ad hoc queries as well as strongly typed queries.
I’d like something that exports to paper easily.
Here’s what I found: org-mode. It’s an Emacs mode for editing text files. It provides sophisticated functionality, but all the sophistication is in the software, not the data format. It’s more convenient to work with org-mode files in Emacs, but the raw file format is just a light-weight mark-down, easy for a person or a computer to parse.
When I went back to using Emacs a year ago after a 15-year hiatus, I heard good things about org-mode but didn’t understand what people liked about it. I heard it described as a to-do list manager and was not impressed. I’m not interested in the features I was first introduced to: tracking the status of to-do items and making agendas. I still don’t use those features. It took me a while to realize that org-mode was what I had been looking for. It was similar in spirit to something I’d thought about writing.
Emacs is an acquired taste. But someone who doesn’t use Emacs could get some good ideas from looking at org-mode. I imagine some people have borrowed its ideas and implemented them for other editors. If not, someone should.
The org-mode site has links to numerous introductions and tutorials. I like the FLOSS Weekly interview with org-mode’s creator Carsten Dominik. In it he explains his motivation for writing org-mode and gives a high-level overview of its features.
Related posts:
Giving Emacs another try
Forced to be simple
Not for everyone
Software that gets used
april 2011 by rahuldave
Six Days Working Entirely from Chrome OS [Productivity]
december 2010 by rahuldave
For the last six days, I've used a Chrome OS netbook as my primary computer, and it's been a blast. Using a "just enough", basically Chrome-only system provides a rare chance to reexamine what it is you really need to be productive. More »
Productivity
Chrome
chrome_os
cr-48
Feature
Google_Chrome
Minimalism
NetBooks
Top
Webapps
from google
december 2010 by rahuldave
How to Turn Your Creative Brainstorm into a Completed Project [Project Management]
april 2010 by rahuldave
Behance and 99 Percent founder Scott Belsky spent years researching how creative leaders at Google, Disney, Zappos, and other firms turned brainstorms into completed projects. This excerpt from Making Ideas Happen suggests ways of tackling urgent matters without sacrificing long-term goals. More »
Project_Management
Creativity
Productivity
Project
Republished
task_management
Top
Work
from google
april 2010 by rahuldave
To→done Assigns You Tasks Based on Your Available Time [Productivity]
april 2010 by rahuldave
To→done is an untraditional to-do list webapp that forces you to act without conjuring up overwhelming, negative feelings. It's a to-do list aimed to help you get things done based on how much time you've got on your hands. More »
Productivity
Task_manager
to-do_list
to-do_lists
To-do_managers
from google
april 2010 by rahuldave
The Overwhelming Wave That Makes Us Procrastinate [Procrastination]
april 2010 by rahuldave
Sometimes we put things off because the timing just isn't right; perhaps more often, we procrastinate because of a whole lot of negative emotions overwhelm us the instant we think about a task we've already put off. More »
Procrastination
Emotions
Productivity
Psychology
Top
from google
april 2010 by rahuldave
What Time Do You Wake Up? [Reader Poll]
march 2010 by rahuldave
Programmer Oscar Del Ben discusses how he rearranged his life to fit an up-at-5-am schedule and how it's made him more productive, including tips for how he was able to make the transition to being an early riser. More »
Reader_Poll
Habits
Productivity
Sleep
from google
march 2010 by rahuldave
Reboot Your Office to Return to a Clean Workspace [Clutter]
march 2010 by rahuldave
Every night thousands of workers boot down their work stations and return to them the next morning, booting into a fresh system. Reboot your physical workspace in the same way to keep your office tidy and efficient. More »
Clutter
Cleaning
Efficiency
Office
Organization
Productivity
from google
march 2010 by rahuldave
related tags
Android ⊕ Apple ⊕ appstore ⊕ Beta ⊕ Chrome ⊕ chrome_os ⊕ Cleaning ⊕ Clutter ⊕ Collaboration ⊕ Covey ⊕ cr-48 ⊕ Creativity ⊕ design ⊕ Downloads ⊕ Economics ⊕ Efficiency ⊕ Emacs ⊕ Emotions ⊕ Energy ⊕ Feature ⊕ Getting_Things_Done ⊕ Google_Chrome ⊕ GTD ⊕ Habits ⊕ ios ⊕ Ios_downloads ⊕ ipad ⊕ iPhone_Downloads ⊕ Market_Failure ⊕ Minimalism ⊕ Monitors ⊕ Music ⊕ Napping ⊕ naps ⊕ NetBooks ⊕ News ⊕ Office ⊕ Organization ⊕ Organizers ⊕ Procrastination ⊕ productivity ⊖ Productivity_Tools ⊕ Project ⊕ Projects ⊕ Project_Management ⊕ Psychology ⊕ Quadrants ⊕ Reader_Poll ⊕ Republished ⊕ Sleep ⊕ software ⊕ Tablets ⊕ task_management ⊕ Task_manager ⊕ Technology ⊕ To-Dos ⊕ to-do_list ⊕ to-do_lists ⊕ To-do_managers ⊕ Tools ⊕ Top ⊕ Uncategorized ⊕ Webapps ⊕ Work ⊕ Work_music ⊕ Work_sounds ⊕Copy this bookmark: