jschneider + ontologies 333
Smart Content Re-viewed: Text Analytics and Semantic Content Enrichment
february 2012 by jschneider
"There are other solution providers in the content analytics meets semantic annotation/enrichment game. In addition to IBM and Ontotext, they include HP Autonomy, MarkLogic, OpenText, Temis, and the nascent, open-source IKS project. Other vendors offer enterprise-strength building blocks, for instance, SAS via the various SAS Text Analytics components."
text-analytics
NLP
datamining
visualization
content-analytics
content-enrichment
semantic-content-enrichment
linkeddata
ontologies
february 2012 by jschneider
Ontologies and ontology languages defined - without any "semantics" "Jakoblog - The weblog of Jakob Voss
july 2011 by jschneider
"By my definition ontology has nothing to do with "semantics," at least would be the reference for clarification of little help. "
ontologies
definitions
july 2011 by jschneider
Tom Morris - Busting a semantic web myth: “top-down committees”
june 2011 by jschneider
"Here is how an ontology is actually designed in my experience.
Someone, usually a programmer, has an idea, sometimes derived from the practical experience of building something.
They sketch out the idea on the back of a cigarette packet
They open their text editor and start typing Notation3 (or if they are masochists RDF/XML) into said text editor.
Once they are satisfied, they publish that file on the Web.
""You can have bureaucracy and committees if you like, but it isn’t obligatory. SKOS is a W3C standard, and it is quite a useful ontology. But it isn’t special or blessed or magical: it’s just an ontology like any other. It happens to be on w3.org rather than tommorris.org but Semantic Web software doesn’t see any difference."
semanticweb
lodlam
ontologies
design
Someone, usually a programmer, has an idea, sometimes derived from the practical experience of building something.
They sketch out the idea on the back of a cigarette packet
They open their text editor and start typing Notation3 (or if they are masochists RDF/XML) into said text editor.
Once they are satisfied, they publish that file on the Web.
""You can have bureaucracy and committees if you like, but it isn’t obligatory. SKOS is a W3C standard, and it is quite a useful ontology. But it isn’t special or blessed or magical: it’s just an ontology like any other. It happens to be on w3.org rather than tommorris.org but Semantic Web software doesn’t see any difference."
june 2011 by jschneider
The New Yorker Digital Edition : Aug 04, 1986 [cover image]
january 2011 by jschneider
Sometimes ontologies and classification are less yummy than expected. I think this one was from David Shotton
newyorker
covers
images
ontologies
beyondthepdf
classification
january 2011 by jschneider
Mark everything up! » A lode of OWL
january 2011 by jschneider
"Live OWL Documentation Environment (LODE) is a web service that automatically extracts classes, object properties, data properties, named individuals, annotation properties, general axioms and namespace declarations from an OWL ontology available on the Web, and renders them as ordered lists, together with their textual definitions, in a human-readable HTML page designed for browsing and navigation by means of embedded links."
OWL
ontologies
documentation
january 2011 by jschneider
[no title]
january 2011 by jschneider
"The AIM schema contains a unique
identifier to the image available in
all the representation languages, so
the image is linked to the annotation regardless of whether the annotation is serialized to DICOMSR, HL7 CDA XML, or OWL.""The process by which users viewed images and created AIM annotations was similar to the current process radiologists use
to perform this task, by drawing or notating
directly on images (see Figure 1). However,
the annotation tool creates semantic structure (hidden from the user during annotation), which is stored in computer-accessible
formats. Thus, AIM and the annotation tool
provide a means to conceptually link the
image to its semantic contents for subsequent data analysis or access on the Semantic Web." <-- clever!
DICOM
AIM
image-annotation
annotation
semantic
web
e-science
OWL
ontologies
identifier to the image available in
all the representation languages, so
the image is linked to the annotation regardless of whether the annotation is serialized to DICOMSR, HL7 CDA XML, or OWL.""The process by which users viewed images and created AIM annotations was similar to the current process radiologists use
to perform this task, by drawing or notating
directly on images (see Figure 1). However,
the annotation tool creates semantic structure (hidden from the user during annotation), which is stored in computer-accessible
formats. Thus, AIM and the annotation tool
provide a means to conceptually link the
image to its semantic contents for subsequent data analysis or access on the Semantic Web." <-- clever!
january 2011 by jschneider
Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative::very large crosslingual resources
december 2010 by jschneider
"Crosslingual matching of the Thesaurus of the Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision (GTAA), the New York Times subject headings and DBpedia was a test case on ontology matching of very large crosslingual resources reported at ISWC this year.
Task description:
http://www.cs.vu.nl/~laurah/oaei/2010/
The preliminary paper was part of an IWSC workshop based on aligning ontologies across languages:
http://om2010.ontologymatching.org/#prg
It suggests that an updated paper will be released, but for now I find this:
http://disi.unitn.it/~p2p/OM-2010/oaei10_paper0.pdf
"
ontologies
TimesTopics
GTAA
DBpedia
Task description:
http://www.cs.vu.nl/~laurah/oaei/2010/
The preliminary paper was part of an IWSC workshop based on aligning ontologies across languages:
http://om2010.ontologymatching.org/#prg
It suggests that an updated paper will be released, but for now I find this:
http://disi.unitn.it/~p2p/OM-2010/oaei10_paper0.pdf
"
december 2010 by jschneider
Failing To Use OWL To Merge Occurrence Ontologies » Roger Hyam
november 2010 by jschneider
"I did some work last year on merging occurrence status vocabularies for the PESI project and, as I really wanted to make use of OWL in some way, I attempted to do this by creating a set of related ontologies then using inference to produce a magical-semantic-merging of them all. As this was a new thing for me I wrote it up as I went along." "The use of Web Ontology Language (OWL) to Combine Extant Controlled Vocabularies in Biodiversity Informatics Appears Redundant"
ontologies
OWL
peer-review
november 2010 by jschneider
Pellet Integrity Constraint Validator
october 2010 by jschneider
"Pellet Integrity Constraint Validator (Pellet ICV) treats OWL as a schema or validation language for RDF data via auto-generated SPARQL queries that can be executed on any SPARQL-enabled RDF store. Pellet ICV extends core Pellet by interpreting OWL axioms with integrity constraint semantics. That means you can write ontologies that validate RDF data via auto-generated SPARQL queries."
pellet
OWL
SPARQL
ontologies
validation
october 2010 by jschneider
related tags
"metadata-wants-to-be-free" ⊕ "semantic-intranet" ⊕ "tetherless-web" ⊕ "web-science" ⊕ *** ⊕ **** ⊕ ***** ⊕ ****** ⊕ ******* ⊕ Aaron ⊕ aboutness ⊕ academia ⊕ academic ⊕ advertising ⊕ AI ⊕ AIM ⊕ ALA ⊕ ALA2007 ⊕ Alf ⊕ alignment ⊕ Allan ⊕ Allen ⊕ alpha ⊕ amino-acids-ontology ⊕ annotation ⊕ api ⊕ apis ⊕ application-profiles ⊕ argumentation ⊕ authoring ⊕ BBC ⊕ beyondthepdf ⊕ bible ⊕ bibliographic-control ⊕ bibliographic-ontologies ⊕ bibliography ⊕ BIBO ⊕ bio-zen ⊕ biodiversity ⊕ bioinformatics ⊕ biology ⊕ biomedical ⊕ biomedicine ⊕ biosciences ⊕ blogging ⊕ blogs ⊕ Blyberg ⊕ books ⊕ books-toread ⊕ borges ⊕ both-and ⊕ Bradley ⊕ Breeding ⊕ Bristol ⊕ broadcasting ⊕ browser ⊕ BT ⊕ business-models ⊕ calendaring ⊕ Cameron ⊕ carole ⊕ CAS ⊕ cataloging ⊕ CDWA ⊕ cfp ⊕ changes ⊕ chemistry ⊕ Christina ⊕ cidoc ⊕ citations ⊕ CiTO ⊕ civilliberties ⊕ classification ⊕ clay ⊕ closedworld ⊕ cloud-computing ⊕ code4lib ⊕ collaboration ⊕ collaborative-filtering ⊕ composite-ontology ⊕ concepts ⊕ conferences ⊕ connotea ⊕ content-analytics ⊕ content-enrichment ⊕ context ⊕ contextual-tagging ⊕ controlled-languages ⊕ controlled-vocabularies ⊕ cool ⊕ courses ⊕ covers ⊕ Crawford ⊕ CRM ⊕ crossref ⊕ crosswalking ⊕ crowdsourcing ⊕ cultural-heritage ⊕ cyc ⊕ Cyganiak ⊕ DAML+OIL ⊕ data ⊕ data-mining ⊕ data-modeling ⊕ data-models ⊕ data-services ⊕ databases ⊕ datacuration ⊕ datamining ⊕ datamodeling ⊕ Dave ⊕ davis ⊕ dbpedia ⊕ DC ⊕ definitions ⊕ del.icio.us ⊕ delicious ⊕ design ⊕ design-patterns ⊕ designpatterns ⊕ Dewey ⊕ DICOM ⊕ diff ⊕ diffs ⊕ digital-first ⊕ digital-signatures ⊕ directories ⊕ disease ⊕ DOAP ⊕ documentation ⊕ dolce ⊕ Drupal ⊕ Dubin ⊕ DublinCore ⊕ E-R ⊕ e-science ⊕ EARMARK ⊕ Eaton ⊕ ecommerce ⊕ emotion ⊕ endurants ⊕ epidemiology ⊕ Eric ⊕ escience ⊕ events ⊕ evidence ⊕ examples ⊕ Excel ⊕ Exhibit ⊕ expert-systems ⊕ facets ⊕ faviki ⊕ fiction ⊕ Fiona ⊕ fireeagle ⊕ flex ⊕ FOAF ⊕ folksonomies ⊕ folksonomy ⊕ food ⊕ formal-methods ⊕ forms ⊕ frameworks ⊕ France ⊕ frbr ⊕ FRBRoo ⊕ Frye ⊕ functional-logic ⊕ future ⊕ Garlik ⊕ gender ⊕ genomics ⊕ GGG ⊕ GIS ⊕ GNU ⊕ governance ⊕ granularity ⊕ greasemonkey ⊕ Gruber ⊕ GTAA ⊕ HCLS ⊕ HCLS-examples ⊕ health ⊕ healthcare ⊕ Heath ⊕ hierarchy ⊕ highered ⊕ history ⊕ history-of-technology ⊕ HP ⊕ humanities ⊕ humor ⊕ hyperlinks ⊕ hypertext ⊕ ian ⊕ IBM ⊕ identifiers ⊕ identities ⊕ idocument ⊕ IEEE ⊕ ILS ⊕ image ⊕ image-annotation ⊕ images ⊕ indexing ⊕ indices ⊕ information ⊕ information-artifacts ⊕ information-extraction ⊕ information-overload ⊕ information-resources ⊕ infrastructure ⊕ interesting ⊕ interfaces ⊕ interoperability ⊕ IPTC ⊕ IR ⊕ iswc2009 ⊕ Java ⊕ JCDL ⊕ Jena ⊕ Jeni ⊕ Joan ⊕ John ⊕ Jon ⊕ journalism ⊕ Journals ⊕ Karen ⊕ kb ⊕ KIF ⊕ KMQL ⊕ knowledge-engineering ⊕ knowledge-integration ⊕ knowledge-representation ⊕ KQML ⊕ labelling ⊕ language ⊕ latex ⊕ LCSH ⊕ legal ⊕ Liakarta ⊕ library ⊕ library-vs-google ⊕ Lindner ⊕ linkeddata ⊕ LIS ⊕ LLD ⊕ lodlam ⊕ logic ⊕ lolcats ⊕ lpnews ⊕ lucene ⊕ Manchester ⊕ mapping ⊕ Maps ⊕ MARC ⊕ Maria ⊕ marine ⊕ Mark ⊕ marketplace ⊕ markup ⊕ markup-languages ⊕ markuplanguages ⊕ Marshall ⊕ mashups ⊕ math ⊕ mathematics ⊕ Max-Planck ⊕ MCAT ⊕ measurement ⊕ media ⊕ medicine ⊕ mereology ⊕ mereotopology ⊕ merging ⊕ MeSH ⊕ metadata ⊕ metaphors ⊕ metrology ⊕ Microformats ⊕ Miller ⊕ modeling ⊕ modelling ⊕ MODS ⊕ MoinMoin ⊕ multi-agent ⊕ multi-agents ⊕ multimedia ⊕ multipedia ⊕ Mundaneum ⊕ museum ⊕ music ⊕ n-triples ⊕ nasa ⊕ navigation ⊕ NeOn ⊕ Netherlands ⊕ newyorker ⊕ Neylon ⊕ NIST ⊕ NKS ⊕ NLM ⊕ nlp ⊕ Nodalities ⊕ noise-in-search ⊕ NT ⊕ nytimes ⊕ occurrants ⊕ OCLC ⊕ old ⊕ omnigator ⊕ online-argumentation ⊕ online-arguments ⊕ ontologies ⊖ ontologies-are-value-neutral ⊕ ontology-alignment ⊕ ontology-development ⊕ ontology-mapping ⊕ ontology-matching ⊕ OPAC ⊕ opencyc ⊕ opendata ⊕ opensource ⊕ openworld ⊕ operational ⊕ OREChem ⊕ Otlet ⊕ owl ⊕ OWL-DL ⊕ OWL2 ⊕ owl:sameAs ⊕ oxford ⊕ Palmer ⊕ Paolo ⊕ part-whole ⊕ part-whole-relationships ⊕ patterns ⊕ Paul ⊕ peer-review ⊕ pellet ⊕ people ⊕ persistants ⊕ personalization ⊕ pharmaceuticals ⊕ phenotypes ⊕ philosophy ⊕ PIkas ⊕ PINES ⊕ plugins ⊕ podcasts ⊕ postcoordinate-indexing ⊕ precision ⊕ presentations ⊕ privacy ⊕ proceedings ⊕ projects ⊕ proofs ⊕ protege ⊕ protoge ⊕ prsentations ⊕ PSI ⊕ publishing ⊕ purple ⊕ purposes ⊕ python ⊕ quality ⊕ question-answering ⊕ RDA ⊕ rdf ⊕ RDFa ⊕ rdfex ⊕ RDFS ⊕ reading ⊕ reasoning ⊕ recommendations ⊕ recursion ⊕ references ⊕ relevance ⊕ remixable ⊕ Renear ⊕ reports ⊕ repositories ⊕ requirements ⊕ research ⊕ researchers ⊕ reusabile ⊕ reusability ⊕ RFID ⊕ Richard ⊕ Rob ⊕ roles ⊕ Roy ⊕ RPI ⊕ RSS ⊕ sameAs ⊕ schema ⊕ schemas ⊕ schemeas ⊕ Schneider ⊕ schol-onto ⊕ scholarly-communication ⊕ scholarly-publishing ⊕ science ⊕ scientific-communication ⊕ scientific-communications ⊕ ScientificAmerican ⊕ seamntic-media-wiki ⊕ search ⊕ SEKT ⊕ self-organization ⊕ semantic ⊕ semantic-content-enrichment ⊕ semantic-interoperability ⊕ semantic-publishing ⊕ semantic-web ⊕ semanticlibraries ⊕ semanticlibrarries ⊕ semanticpublishing ⊕ semantics ⊕ semanticsearch ⊕ semanticweb ⊕ semiosis ⊕ services ⊕ shirky ⊕ signs ⊕ simile ⊕ SIOC ⊕ skos ⊕ SOA ⊕ SOAP ⊕ SOBR ⊕ social-bookmarking ⊕ socialsoftware ⊕ software ⊕ solr ⊕ space ⊕ SPAR ⊕ Sparql ⊕ SPARQL ⊕ standards ⊕ storytelling ⊕ strategy ⊕ STS ⊕ Styles ⊕ subject-access ⊕ subject-maps ⊕ subject-proxy ⊕ subjects ⊕ summer-schools ⊕ SUMO ⊕ SWAN ⊕ Swartz ⊕ Sweden ⊕ synonymity ⊕ systems-biology ⊕ tagclouds ⊕ tagging ⊕ tags ⊕ talis ⊕ taxonomies ⊕ taxonomy ⊕ technology ⊕ Tennant ⊕ Tennison ⊕ text-analytics ⊕ textmining ⊕ thesauri ⊕ time ⊕ Times ⊕ TimesTopics ⊕ tiredness ⊕ tolook ⊕ Tom ⊕ tools ⊕ Topic ⊕ topic-maps ⊕ topicmaps ⊕ toread ⊕ transgender ⊕ transitivity ⊕ travel ⊕ trust ⊕ TV ⊕ twine ⊕ types ⊕ UDDI ⊕ Udell ⊕ UIUC ⊕ UK ⊕ UMd ⊕ UN ⊕ unconferences ⊕ units ⊕ upper-level-ontologies ⊕ Urban ⊕ URI ⊕ URIs ⊕ user-content ⊕ validation ⊕ vendors ⊕ via:@edsu ⊕ via:@gbilder ⊕ via:@juansequeda ⊕ via:@skruk ⊕ videos ⊕ visualization ⊕ visualstudio ⊕ vocabularies ⊕ vocabulary ⊕ vocabulary-maintenance ⊕ vocabulary-problem ⊕ vocamp2008 ⊕ void ⊕ W3C ⊕ Walt ⊕ web ⊕ web-of-metadata ⊕ web2.0 ⊕ web3.0 ⊕ whisky ⊕ wiki ⊕ wikipedia ⊕ wikis ⊕ Williams ⊕ wolfram ⊕ wonderweb ⊕ Word ⊕ Wordle ⊕ workflows ⊕ workshops ⊕ Worldcat ⊕ xml ⊕ XMP ⊕ XMPP ⊕ XQuery ⊕ XSLT ⊕ YouTube ⊕ Zigtag_Imported_Bookmarks ⊕ zotero ⊕Copy this bookmark: