Accessify Forum: WCAG 2.0
november 2005 by joeclark
‘Whenever talk of validity comes up, the focus quickly moves to whether WAI want to impose something that could potentially be legislated, even though it's not in their remit to concern themselves with legislation and everyone knows the real reason’
juicystudio
wcag-validation
wcag
wai
november 2005 by joeclark
Standards, Validity and Conformance
november 2005 by joeclark
Arguments for and against valid code in WCAG 2 (yet again)
accessibility
validation
webstandards
wcag-validation
november 2005 by joeclark
W3C specs requiring valid code
november 2005 by joeclark
Curiously, HTML 4.01 isn’t one of them
html
validation
wcag-validation
webstandards
november 2005 by joeclark
Guideline 4.1 Background and Proposal
october 2005 by joeclark
Wendy Chisholm’s proposal for requiring valid code in WCAG 2
wcag
wai
webstandards
validation
wendychisholm
wcag-validation
october 2005 by joeclark
WAI’s latest (to this very moment) plans for requiring valid (X)HTML in WCAG 2
october 2005 by joeclark
See if you can understand this. I sure can’t
wai
wcag
webstandards
validation
wcag-validation
october 2005 by joeclark
related tags
accessibility ⊕ html ⊕ juicystudio ⊕ validation ⊕ wai ⊕ wcag ⊕ wcag-validation ⊖ webaccessibility ⊕ webstandards ⊕ wendychisholm ⊕Copy this bookmark: