Minor, trivial

I rather doubt this is the whole story. Among other things, it makes it sound like there wasn’t violent disagreement and de facto ganging up by IBM, Oracle, and SAP

‘Whenever talk of validity comes up, the focus quickly moves to whether WAI want to impose something that could potentially be legislated, even though it's not in their remit to concern themselves with legislation and everyone knows the real reason’

Talking about WCAG, presumably ineffectually

Pushing WCAG 2 to the Spanish, no doubt ineffectually

Thousands of words from WCAG attempting to explain this doomed term

...which will then be indicated by a logo ‘formali[z]ed’ by the W3C

‘A very rough calculation suggested that overall spending on this meeting itself is €3,000/hour’

Wendy Chisholm’s proposal for requiring valid code in WCAG 2

See if you can understand this. I sure can’t

‘Readers... cannot understand WCAG 2.0 because..., as a whole, [it] is vague and abstract’

Yes, these people have something else to distract themselves with. Just write the fucking guidelines

For WCAG Working Group Task Force (sic) Team C (doing little-publicized work for upcoming face-to-face meeting)

For WCAG Working Group Task Force (sic) Team B (doing little-publicized work for upcoming face-to-face meeting)

For WCAG Working Group Task Force (sic) Team A (doing little-publicized work for upcoming face-to-face meeting)

in Germany in October

By Gez Lemon, Britain's national treasure. Still want to trust Bobby and its progeny?

Something to do with RDF accessibility