What’s wrong with the new ‘Globe and Mail’ mobile site?
january 2011 by joeclark
Here’s what I asked Greg MacGregor. I’m sure Craig will shake his head with bemusement.
I'm really not clear why your new mobile site can't even bother to declare
<doctype HTML> or its human language, or use real links (href="#" means
nothing), or use an alt text that isn't "img", or use the CSS cascade
instead of malarkey like class="serif fontsmall menuitem gbb", or heading
elements.
In short, how is your mobile site new and improved if it doesn't really
even have HTML?
webstandards
globeandmail
gregmacgregor
mobilebrowser
mobile
mobileweb
failedredesigns
I'm really not clear why your new mobile site can't even bother to declare
<doctype HTML> or its human language, or use real links (href="#" means
nothing), or use an alt text that isn't "img", or use the CSS cascade
instead of malarkey like class="serif fontsmall menuitem gbb", or heading
elements.
In short, how is your mobile site new and improved if it doesn't really
even have HTML?
january 2011 by joeclark
Claimed Visionary Design shortlist
february 2006 by joeclark
Check the Failed Redesigns section (under another name)
blind
accessibility
webaccessibility
awards
visionary-design
failedredesigns
february 2006 by joeclark
Failed Commitments?
january 2006 by joeclark
i.e., failed redesigns
failedredesigns
webstandards
karldubost
january 2006 by joeclark
Failed Redesigns
january 2006 by joeclark
‘Because You *Should* Have Known Better’
webstandards
failedredesigns
joeclark
january 2006 by joeclark
Copy this bookmark: