Seems to be taking the "authoritative" approach, which I swear Wikipedia tried (and failed at) back when it was Nupedia. But Nupedia didn't have a gazillion dollars to bank on, either.

Over 500 edits, most of them from today, when it was released. Flex the hive mind.

And, in classic Wikipedia fashion, Tekken 6 is edging out Mother Teresa

"I love Wikipedia. It's by far the most entertaining open-source project to ever exist, and yes, I am counting LInux and all of the LInux User Group online photo albums it is responsible for."

The talk pages for your favorite porn stars (you *do* have a favorite, right?) are more interesting than you think

Then you can edit using your text editor of choice. Rock?

It's my great hope that conservatives will create parallels of all of our pesky fact-based resources until the Rapture finally happens and those idiot motherfuckers finally leave the rest of us alone.

So much amazingly good stuff here

Give it a block of text, it returns Wikipedia links. Brilliant...

"List of gay porn stars" is number 6 but "sex" is 64. Even Hitler ranks in the 30's!

pass it a string, it returns wikipedia links.

Old guy gets cranky about something false somebody wrote on the internets. Film at 11. Repeat after me -- if you're using the Wikipedia as an aboslute, definitive source, you're using it incorrectly.

Heh

"I completely fail to comprehend why Tor server operators consistently refuse to take responsibility for their crazed users." Probably because Tor doesn't allow you to know what your "users" are doing. This seems like a weakness in both Tor and Wikipedia.

Amazing that they've got so much information up there, so quickly

When Microsoft jumps on board, be afraid

If you had any doubt how cool Google is [via /.]