jakewalker + fedcourts 5
Civil Procedure & Federal Courts Blog: Federal Judicial Center Report on the Impact of Twombly/Iqbal
march 2011 by jakewalker
This report presents the findings of a Federal Judicial Center study on the filing and resolution of motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The study was requested by the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Civil Rules. The study compared motion activity in 23 federal district courts in 2006 and 2010 and included an assessment of the outcome of motions in orders that do not appear in the computerized legal reference systems such as Westlaw. Statistical models were used to control for such factors as differences in levels of motion activity in individual federal district courts and types of cases.
civpro
pleading
twombly
iqbal
standards
fedcourts
march 2011 by jakewalker
Federal judges are getting older—and more often senile. - By Joseph Goldstein - Slate Magazine
january 2011 by jakewalker
Others wondered if the judge's memory was failing him. After all, the most famous case in his long career—the back-to-back trials of Silicon Valley investment banker Frank Quattrone—had revolved around a single e-mail. Yet he now acted as though this was the first he was hearing about it. "He didn't understand what was happening in his own courtroom," said one lawyer present that day.
fedcourts
age
retirement
january 2011 by jakewalker
Reindhart concurrence on certified question
january 2011 by jakewalker
As a result, the technical barriers
and the inexplicable manner in which the parties have conducted this litigation may10
in the end not preclude an orderly review by the federal courts of the critical
constitutional question that is of interest to all Americans, and particularly to the
millions of Californians who voted for Proposition 8 and the tens of thousands of
same-sex couples who wish to marry in that state. I
prop8
standing
fedcourts
9thcircuit
gdc
and the inexplicable manner in which the parties have conducted this litigation may10
in the end not preclude an orderly review by the federal courts of the critical
constitutional question that is of interest to all Americans, and particularly to the
millions of Californians who voted for Proposition 8 and the tens of thousands of
same-sex couples who wish to marry in that state. I
january 2011 by jakewalker
Copy this bookmark: