In case you haven't seen it:

Other documents entered as evidence come from an internal July 2010 presentation given by Rubin. They reveal that the company got advertising revenue of just $16.8m from Android handsets in 2009, but by mid-year of 2010 that had grown to $132.1m from ads on the fast-growing handset market – though Apple devices such as the iPhone and iPad using Google's search and maps generated $281m, or more than twice as much in total.

Useful ammunition for anyone renegotiating a deal with Google; these detailed internal figures are less than two years old. Apple's success for Google is two-edged: Google has to pay a substantial sum back in revenue share, making iOS devices less valuable to the bottom line than Android handsets.

Henry Blodget's analysis pretty much defines the word "trenchant".

Henry Blodget points out that Yahoo's Alibaba sale will bring in much less cash than the $17bn people have suggested, and will actually just be in companies whose value will be uncertain.

"The shortfall in iPad sales was one of the few categories the Street called correctly."<br />
<br />
Still.. one out of six (iPods, iPads, iPhones, Macs, revenue, profit) isn't bad, eh?<br />
<br />
How long before a Wall Street firm hires one of the bloggers to do the forecasting job?