Une page 404 qui se donne les moyens de ses ambitions
august 2011 by citizenk
Serions-nous tombés sur la page 404 la plus réussie de tout l’Internet ? S’il est évidemment difficile de l’affirmer, vous conviendrez sans aucun mal que l’équipe du site Nosh.me s’est clairement donné les moyens de ses ambitions, en nous offrant une page d’erreur qui devrait en toute logique vous souffler. Aller, trêve de blabla, la page en question est à admirer en suivant ce lien.
Lire la suite..
Copyright © JournalduGeek.com | Retrouvez-nous aussi sur Facebook et Twitter | Site hébergé par Typhon
Sur_le_web
404
LOL
Internet
from google
Lire la suite..
Copyright © JournalduGeek.com | Retrouvez-nous aussi sur Facebook et Twitter | Site hébergé par Typhon
august 2011 by citizenk
Form Art
april 2011 by citizenk
Form Art is a project made by Alexei Shulgin in 1997. In 1997! He used formal elements of the HTML language, without adding anything to them, to create compositions, animations, images, … The website is packed with little pieces, but make sure to check out the animations and the game.
art
interaction
interface
internet
from google
april 2011 by citizenk
DLFP: Une alternative à Internet : Netsukuku
november 2010 by citizenk
Une alternative à Internet : Netsukuku | DLFP #internet
#internet
internet
from twitter_favs
november 2010 by citizenk
Une alternative à Internet : Netsukuku - LinuxFr.org
november 2010 by citizenk
Une alternative à Internet : Netsukuku | DLFP #internet
internet
from twitter_favs
november 2010 by citizenk
The Awesome Size Of The Internet - Pierre Tran
november 2010 by citizenk
The Awesome Size Of The Internet #infographic #internet
#infographic
#internet
infographic
internet
from twitter_favs
november 2010 by citizenk
Email Insanity & the 0.001 Challenge
april 2008 by citizenk
Via a Toot by Jeff Atwood comes this thoughtful post by Tantek Çelik on how email is no longer working for him. His first reason is a biggie:
1. Point to point communications do not scale.
All forms of communication where you have to expend time and energy on communicating with a specific person (anything that has a notion of “To” in the interface that you have to fill in) are doomed to fail at some limit. If you are really good you might be able to respond to dozens (some claim hundreds) of individual emails a day but at some point you will simply be spending all your time writing email rather than actually “working” on any thing in particular (next-actions or projects, e.g. coding, authoring, drawing, enjoying your life etc.)
This is one reason I’m getting attracted to using Get Satisfaction as a way to expose help issues to a large group of helpers and helpees (BTW, we’re just getting started on GS — FAQs and more will be coming soon). I’m also realizing that this is why I (and Jonathan Coulton and probably you) struggle with holding up dozens of one-on-one conversations — it locks up your attention and its fruits in thousands of inaccessible alcoves. And truly, that does not and will not scale.
But, y’know, as I read Tantek’s post, alongside his “Communication Protocols” notes, I found myself returning to a pet theory that I’ve been too embarrassed to lay out in a real post. But what the heck, I’ll capture some notes and you can tell me what you think:
I suspect that email encourages people to act insane.
Right this minute, you can create an email of unlimited length covering topics of unlimited scope and then send it to unlimited numbers of people — whom you may or may not even know — all at absolutely no cost to you. There is also no prohibition or boundary of any kind on how you phrase that email. There’s no formal penalty or even feedback for when you’re using email inappropriately (e.g. the dirty look that you’d get if you said something this weird to someone’s face). Plus, of course, YOU get to decide (at least in your own head) exactly how quickly all those people should be getting back to you about whatever it is you emailed them about. And you can do this pretty much any time you want and as many times a day as it suits you. No Limits.
An optimist would say this indicates what a wonderfully flexible tool email is. But, a pessimist with 1500 unread emails will point out that this Wild West of Communication seems to bring out the nut in people.
As I say, there must be something about email’s unusual combination of intimacy and distance that can get people very emotionally engaged in hammering out demands in an email message. And not just flames — I’m talking about people whose de facto style is borne out of an uninhibited conduit between thoughts, emotions, or desires and the email medium that helps them convert that into some kind of request.
How and why this is related to Tantek’s post, I’m not entirely sure. But I think there’s some common ground here. Especially as this relates to that one-on-one idea and why it doesn’t scale.
Email culture and etiquette — if there is such a thing — occurs when people have a sense of how their behavior will be seen and evaluated by anyone who is not themselves. The reason most of us wear pants to the grocery store is the same reason that some people think very hard about every word that goes into their email messages and what it will mean when people read them. They understand that the message should be more about the recipient than themselves. And the Great Ones will take the time to get the tone right too — to phrase things so that misunderstandings and unintentional emotional provocations don’t occur.
But if — even without realizing it — you see email primarily as a one-on-one medium for venting some…thing that’s on your mind, you’re going to produce a lot of electronic madness. Especially if you think no one is watching.
I’m going to think on this some more, but I’ll close with a related thought on why this all goes straight back to Time & Attention 101.
Any system without scarcity or limitation will eventually suffer at the hands of people who aren’t overtly aware of boundaries — or who actively choose to break those boundaries because they can. Limitations in a communication medium not only make you think a little harder about what you have to say, they also encourage you to focus on what you and your recipient really need out of the exchange.
While I’m not suggesting anything as extreme as the five-sentence email, I wonder if this might be a fun exercise to try for a day:
The 0.001 Challenge
Imagine that the person receiving the email you’re composing receives 1,000 other message each day more or less identical to yours. What would you do to distinguish yours from the others? What change would make your email amazingly easy to deal with and not insane? Does the content of your email belong someplace else? Like an SMS, a face-to-face meeting — or maybe even in an angry, venting screed that you never send.
Commentary
Crazy_Modern_Life
Email
Internet
Personal_Productivity
Time_&_Attention
from google
1. Point to point communications do not scale.
All forms of communication where you have to expend time and energy on communicating with a specific person (anything that has a notion of “To” in the interface that you have to fill in) are doomed to fail at some limit. If you are really good you might be able to respond to dozens (some claim hundreds) of individual emails a day but at some point you will simply be spending all your time writing email rather than actually “working” on any thing in particular (next-actions or projects, e.g. coding, authoring, drawing, enjoying your life etc.)
This is one reason I’m getting attracted to using Get Satisfaction as a way to expose help issues to a large group of helpers and helpees (BTW, we’re just getting started on GS — FAQs and more will be coming soon). I’m also realizing that this is why I (and Jonathan Coulton and probably you) struggle with holding up dozens of one-on-one conversations — it locks up your attention and its fruits in thousands of inaccessible alcoves. And truly, that does not and will not scale.
But, y’know, as I read Tantek’s post, alongside his “Communication Protocols” notes, I found myself returning to a pet theory that I’ve been too embarrassed to lay out in a real post. But what the heck, I’ll capture some notes and you can tell me what you think:
I suspect that email encourages people to act insane.
Right this minute, you can create an email of unlimited length covering topics of unlimited scope and then send it to unlimited numbers of people — whom you may or may not even know — all at absolutely no cost to you. There is also no prohibition or boundary of any kind on how you phrase that email. There’s no formal penalty or even feedback for when you’re using email inappropriately (e.g. the dirty look that you’d get if you said something this weird to someone’s face). Plus, of course, YOU get to decide (at least in your own head) exactly how quickly all those people should be getting back to you about whatever it is you emailed them about. And you can do this pretty much any time you want and as many times a day as it suits you. No Limits.
An optimist would say this indicates what a wonderfully flexible tool email is. But, a pessimist with 1500 unread emails will point out that this Wild West of Communication seems to bring out the nut in people.
As I say, there must be something about email’s unusual combination of intimacy and distance that can get people very emotionally engaged in hammering out demands in an email message. And not just flames — I’m talking about people whose de facto style is borne out of an uninhibited conduit between thoughts, emotions, or desires and the email medium that helps them convert that into some kind of request.
How and why this is related to Tantek’s post, I’m not entirely sure. But I think there’s some common ground here. Especially as this relates to that one-on-one idea and why it doesn’t scale.
Email culture and etiquette — if there is such a thing — occurs when people have a sense of how their behavior will be seen and evaluated by anyone who is not themselves. The reason most of us wear pants to the grocery store is the same reason that some people think very hard about every word that goes into their email messages and what it will mean when people read them. They understand that the message should be more about the recipient than themselves. And the Great Ones will take the time to get the tone right too — to phrase things so that misunderstandings and unintentional emotional provocations don’t occur.
But if — even without realizing it — you see email primarily as a one-on-one medium for venting some…thing that’s on your mind, you’re going to produce a lot of electronic madness. Especially if you think no one is watching.
I’m going to think on this some more, but I’ll close with a related thought on why this all goes straight back to Time & Attention 101.
Any system without scarcity or limitation will eventually suffer at the hands of people who aren’t overtly aware of boundaries — or who actively choose to break those boundaries because they can. Limitations in a communication medium not only make you think a little harder about what you have to say, they also encourage you to focus on what you and your recipient really need out of the exchange.
While I’m not suggesting anything as extreme as the five-sentence email, I wonder if this might be a fun exercise to try for a day:
The 0.001 Challenge
Imagine that the person receiving the email you’re composing receives 1,000 other message each day more or less identical to yours. What would you do to distinguish yours from the others? What change would make your email amazingly easy to deal with and not insane? Does the content of your email belong someplace else? Like an SMS, a face-to-face meeting — or maybe even in an angry, venting screed that you never send.
april 2008 by citizenk
How Your Creepy Ex-Co-Workers Will Kill Facebook -- Facebook -- InformationWeek
november 2007 by citizenk
Like other "social" apps (cough eVite cough), Facebook has all the social graces of a nose-picking, hyperactive six-year-old, standing at the threshold of your attention and chanting, "I know something, I know something, I know something, won't tell you w
facebook
social
socialnetworks
internet
privacy
november 2007 by citizenk
Virtual Private Sushi!?
august 2007 by citizenk
“wirelesspacket” (quickly becoming one of my favorite chat regulars) sent this suggestion on virtual private networks for individuals.
I was reading your post about Tor or VPN.. Have you ever tried Hamachi? (hamachi.cc) Hamachi is an alternative to VPN. It was highly recommended by Steve Gibson in his Security Now podcast episode 18. aolradio.podcast.aol.com/sn/SN-018.mp3
Hamachi uses AES 256bit encryption creating an Ad-hoch local area network (LAN) using the 5 dot IP address range. (5.xxx.xxx.xxx range) It is also multi platform, running on Windows, Linux and OSX. Hamachi does not send any traffic from your network to there servers. Just your initial login, all connections from there on in are client to client.
Fully Secure.. Here is how you get started…
First, you need to visit the Hamachi website and download there free software. (Spyware free)
Second, install the software. The Hamachi software installs a GUI client with a virtual network adaptor that will allow you to connect to the Hamachi servers and clients.
Third, Create a unique Hamachi network name. You have the ability to use wildcard card characters within your network name. Making it virtually impossible for anyone to guess what network name you have decided to use.
Forth, Use a strong 64 key password. This can be generated at www.grc.com/passwords.htm . Copy and past your network password into the field provided.
Fifth, Download and Install the Hamachi software onto other clients. Have those clients join your Hamachi network. Do this by copying and pasting your network name and password. You have just now created a Hamachi network. (Doesn’t it feel great!)
Simple and efficient.
You now have the ability to use Windows file sharing, FTP, Remote Desktop Connection, VNC, play games and even VPN. All through the ad-hoc LAN network you have just created. (This is Sparta!)
You can now run a VPN server from the privacy of your own home or office without port forwarding. Start your VPN server and Install Hamachi onto that machine. On a machine that has Hamachi already configured. Open the VPN client you wish to use. Input the IP address of the VPN server on your Hamachi network into the client. The address entered should start with 5.xxx.xxx.xxx. You are now connecting to a VPN server over Hamachi.
Double the security and encryption. All done without touching any of the settings on your firewall.
The only problem is, OS X support is shaky. I may have to keep looking, I guess.
Security
Internet
Software
vpn
from google
I was reading your post about Tor or VPN.. Have you ever tried Hamachi? (hamachi.cc) Hamachi is an alternative to VPN. It was highly recommended by Steve Gibson in his Security Now podcast episode 18. aolradio.podcast.aol.com/sn/SN-018.mp3
Hamachi uses AES 256bit encryption creating an Ad-hoch local area network (LAN) using the 5 dot IP address range. (5.xxx.xxx.xxx range) It is also multi platform, running on Windows, Linux and OSX. Hamachi does not send any traffic from your network to there servers. Just your initial login, all connections from there on in are client to client.
Fully Secure.. Here is how you get started…
First, you need to visit the Hamachi website and download there free software. (Spyware free)
Second, install the software. The Hamachi software installs a GUI client with a virtual network adaptor that will allow you to connect to the Hamachi servers and clients.
Third, Create a unique Hamachi network name. You have the ability to use wildcard card characters within your network name. Making it virtually impossible for anyone to guess what network name you have decided to use.
Forth, Use a strong 64 key password. This can be generated at www.grc.com/passwords.htm . Copy and past your network password into the field provided.
Fifth, Download and Install the Hamachi software onto other clients. Have those clients join your Hamachi network. Do this by copying and pasting your network name and password. You have just now created a Hamachi network. (Doesn’t it feel great!)
Simple and efficient.
You now have the ability to use Windows file sharing, FTP, Remote Desktop Connection, VNC, play games and even VPN. All through the ad-hoc LAN network you have just created. (This is Sparta!)
You can now run a VPN server from the privacy of your own home or office without port forwarding. Start your VPN server and Install Hamachi onto that machine. On a machine that has Hamachi already configured. Open the VPN client you wish to use. Input the IP address of the VPN server on your Hamachi network into the client. The address entered should start with 5.xxx.xxx.xxx. You are now connecting to a VPN server over Hamachi.
Double the security and encryption. All done without touching any of the settings on your firewall.
The only problem is, OS X support is shaky. I may have to keep looking, I guess.
august 2007 by citizenk
Codev2:Lawrence Lessig
december 2006 by citizenk
That text is Lessig's "Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace." The second version of that book is "Code v2."
lessig
law
copyright
internet
book
december 2006 by citizenk
Ten Worst Internet Acquisitions Ever - SeekingAlpha
november 2006 by citizenk
Netscape - acquired by AOL (TWX) in 1998 for $4.2 billion. To be fair, this was a mercy acquisition. By the time AOL bought the company, Netscape had been humbled by Microsoft's free Internet Explorer browser. AOL clearly had no plans for Netscape and as
internet
business
list
acquisitions
november 2006 by citizenk
PC World - The 13 Most Embarrassing Web Moments
november 2006 by citizenk
The Internet is the most efficient information distribution system ever known. But if you're not careful, it's also the perfect way to embarrass yourself in front of the entire world.
internet
cyberculture
humour
november 2006 by citizenk
The Reincarnation Portal
october 2006 by citizenk
Welcome to The Reincarnation, a massive multiplayer online game that you can play for free. In this game you take up the role of an ancient mage, guiding your fantasy kingdom with the power of your magic, the strength of your armies and your talent of man
mmorpg
game
internet
october 2006 by citizenk
India: Hole-in-the-Wall
october 2006 by citizenk
An Indian physicist puts a PC with a high speed internet connection in a wall in the slums and watches what happens.
india
cyberculture
sociology
internet
october 2006 by citizenk
Locus Online: Locus Magazine, Cory Doctorow Commentary, September 2006
september 2006 by citizenk
The idea that copyright confers the exclusive right to control copying, performance, adaptation, and general use of a creative work is a polite fiction that has been mostly harmless throughout its brief history, but which has been laid bare by the Interne
copyright
corydoctorow
internet
essay
september 2006 by citizenk
Rob Pegoraro - A 'Mistake' Hollywood Had Better Start Making - washingtonpost.com
september 2006 by citizenk
the Internet at large determines how movies reach customers, and studios need to figure out how to fit a cash register into that pattern -- that is, by charging for quality and convenience that you can't get with a peer-to-peer service's random selection.
movies
business
internet
september 2006 by citizenk
The Observer | World | Wikipedia defies China's censors
september 2006 by citizenk
The founder of Wikipedia, the online encyclopaedia written by its users, has defied the Chinese government by refusing to bow to censorship of politically sensitive entries.
censorship
Wikipedia
China
internet
freedom
Politics
september 2006 by citizenk
Speaking UNIX, Part 3: Do everything right from the command line
september 2006 by citizenk
Discover three essential UNIX® utilities that deliver the entire Internet to your command line.
unix
command-line
internet
september 2006 by citizenk
URL Investigator
august 2006 by citizenk
I needed a quick and easy way to check various stats for websites, and so URL Investigator was born.
url
internet
web
tools
august 2006 by citizenk
Guardian Unlimited Technology | Technology | Andrew Brown: on how much we divulge to Google & co
august 2006 by citizenk
One of the first researchers to demonstrate that we will tell anything, however intimate, to a computer, was Joseph Weizenbaum of MIT, who in 1966 wrote a programme called "Eliza" that parodied non-directional psychotherapy. If the user typed anything in,
google
search
aol
internet
article
privacy
web
august 2006 by citizenk
Lunch over IP: Server farms, where the information age happens
august 2006 by citizenk
Because those bits and bytes don't float off into the ether from nowhere to nowhere: the (supposedly immaterial) information economy is being "built on an infrastructure as imposing as the factories and mills" of the past.
blogs
internet
datacenters
august 2006 by citizenk
Guardian Unlimited Technology | Technology | What is the 1% rule?
july 2006 by citizenk
It's an emerging rule of thumb that suggests that if you get a group of 100 people online then one will create content, 10 will "interact" with it (commenting or offering improvements) and the other 89 will just view it.
internet
web
july 2006 by citizenk
Basic journey of a packet
july 2006 by citizenk
a basic look at the journey of a packet across the Internet, from packet creation to switches, routers, NAT, and the packet's traverse across the Internet
internet
networks
july 2006 by citizenk
Google AdSense begins rich media beta test - JenSense.com
january 2006 by citizenk
Google AdSense is moving beyond the traditional text and graphical advertising to rich media, including interstitials, expanding ads and floating ads. AdSense began contacting publishers last week to be involved in the rich media limited beta test.
google
adsense
ads
news
internet
january 2006 by citizenk
Download Squad
january 2006 by citizenk
en moments from the past year that the people who make the web found coolest, most interesting, funniest, and most throught-provoking
lists
internet
fun
web
january 2006 by citizenk
Hamachi : Stay Connected
december 2005 by citizenk
With Hamachi you can organize two or more computers with an Internet connection into their own virtual network for direct secure communication.
vpn
software
networking
tools
internet
december 2005 by citizenk
Wired News: Berlin May Get Its Own Domain
december 2005 by citizenk
The businessman, Dirk Krischenowski, is bidding to make his city the first in the world with its own domain name: .berlin
domains
internet
absurd
december 2005 by citizenk
American Journalism Review
december 2005 by citizenk
The e-mail interview has become an increasingly popular technique. It eliminates endless rounds of phone tag, and it gives sources a chance to provide well-thought-out answers rather than top-of-the-head responses. But critics warn that it’s hardly a su
journalism
email
internet
analysis
media
december 2005 by citizenk
The TCP/IP Guide - The TCP/IP Guide
december 2005 by citizenk
free online version of The TCP/IP Guide
reference
tcpip
networking
internet
books
december 2005 by citizenk
Wikipedia's open-source label conundrum | CNET News.com
december 2005 by citizenk
If edits are incorrect, they won't get changed until someone else makes the changes. So in effect, there is no final version of a Wikipedia entry. They're more like living documents, always subject to change. Does that mean Wikipedia is always wrong? Not
wiki
wikipedia
internet
open-source
december 2005 by citizenk
related tags
#future ⊕ #hcsm ⊕ #hcsmeu ⊕ #health ⊕ #health20fr ⊕ #infographic ⊕ #internet ⊕ absurd ⊕ acquisitions ⊕ acta ⊕ activism ⊕ ads ⊕ adsense ⊕ adware ⊕ aggregator ⊕ ajax ⊕ analysis ⊕ anonymity ⊕ aol ⊕ api ⊕ architecture ⊕ archives ⊕ art ⊕ article ⊕ arts ⊕ asia ⊕ bbc ⊕ berners-lee ⊕ BitTorrent ⊕ blackout ⊕ blogs ⊕ book ⊕ bookmarks ⊕ books ⊕ browser ⊕ browsers ⊕ business ⊕ cable ⊕ campaign ⊕ cartoon ⊕ censorship ⊕ China ⊕ cliqset ⊕ cloud ⊕ code ⊕ comic ⊕ comics ⊕ command-line ⊕ Commentary ⊕ community ⊕ copyright ⊕ copywrong ⊕ corydoctorow ⊕ Crazy_Modern_Life ⊕ creativecommons ⊕ css ⊕ culture ⊕ curiosity ⊕ cyberculture ⊕ data ⊕ database ⊕ datacenters ⊕ dataportability ⊕ davewiner ⊕ del.icio.us ⊕ democracy ⊕ design ⊕ dev ⊕ development ⊕ devices ⊕ diagram ⊕ dns ⊕ documentary ⊕ dog ⊕ domain ⊕ domains ⊕ DouglasAdams ⊕ economics ⊕ edu ⊕ education ⊕ eff ⊕ email ⊕ essay ⊕ ethimology ⊕ eu ⊕ europe ⊕ experiment ⊕ facebook ⊕ feeds ⊕ france ⊕ free ⊕ freedom ⊕ free_speech ⊕ from:caeciliana ⊕ ftp ⊕ fun ⊕ future ⊕ game ⊕ geek ⊕ gmail ⊕ google ⊕ government ⊕ graphics ⊕ guide ⊕ hackers ⊕ hacks ⊕ hardware ⊕ hcsm ⊕ hcsmeu ⊕ health ⊕ health20fr ⊕ history ⊕ hosts ⊕ humour ⊕ hypertext ⊕ i18n ⊕ icann ⊕ icons ⊕ identity ⊕ idn ⊕ im ⊕ images ⊕ india ⊕ infographic ⊕ information ⊕ interaction ⊕ interesting ⊕ interface ⊕ internet ⊖ interview ⊕ ip ⊕ ipv4 ⊕ ipv6 ⊕ joi-ito ⊕ journalism ⊕ l10n ⊕ l33t ⊕ language ⊕ law ⊕ lessig ⊕ licensing ⊕ lifehacks ⊕ linked-data ⊕ links ⊕ linutop ⊕ linux ⊕ list ⊕ lists ⊕ logo ⊕ LOL ⊕ malware ⊕ map ⊕ mashup ⊕ media ⊕ memory ⊕ mmorpg ⊕ movies ⊕ mozilla ⊕ mp3 ⊕ music ⊕ netneutrality ⊕ netscape ⊕ networking ⊕ networks ⊕ news ⊕ News_In_Brief ⊕ notes ⊕ nz ⊕ oauth ⊕ online ⊕ open-source ⊕ opensocial ⊕ P2P ⊕ pandora ⊕ paper ⊕ parody ⊕ pdf ⊕ Personal_Productivity ⊕ piracy ⊕ planets ⊕ plurilinguism ⊕ politics ⊕ popular ⊕ porn ⊕ presentation ⊕ print ⊕ privacy ⊕ procrastination ⊕ productivity ⊕ profile ⊕ programming ⊕ protest ⊕ pushbutton ⊕ python ⊕ radio ⊕ rant ⊕ realtime ⊕ reference ⊕ repression ⊕ research ⊕ resource ⊕ resources ⊕ rfc ⊕ rights ⊕ rss ⊕ rsscloud ⊕ science ⊕ search ⊕ security ⊕ Sesame_Street ⊕ slang ⊕ social ⊕ socialnetworking ⊕ socialnetworks ⊕ socialsoftware ⊕ society ⊕ sociology ⊕ software ⊕ spam ⊕ spyware ⊕ stephenfry ⊕ storage ⊕ streaming ⊕ surveillance ⊕ Sur_le_web ⊕ switzerland ⊕ syndication ⊕ tbl ⊕ tcpip ⊕ technology ⊕ Thunderbird ⊕ timbl ⊕ timeline ⊕ Time_&_Attention ⊕ tiny ⊕ tips ⊕ tools ⊕ tor ⊕ Torrents ⊕ trends ⊕ tutorial ⊕ twitter ⊕ uk ⊕ unix ⊕ upcoming.org ⊕ url ⊕ utilities ⊕ video ⊕ vintage ⊕ visualization ⊕ vpn ⊕ w3c ⊕ web ⊕ webdesign ⊕ wiki ⊕ wikinews ⊕ wikipedia ⊕ windows ⊕ wired ⊕ www ⊕ yahoo! ⊕Copy this bookmark: