alexhansford + design_patterns 2
The New Amex Biz Travel Site Thinks I’m An Idiot
october 2011 by alexhansford
American Express is rolling out a new travel service for its business customers. As is customary for today’s web services, there’s are terms and conditions that the new user needs to agree to when they sign up.
Now, these are often implemented with a checkbox that says something like “I have read and agree to the terms and conditions.” Most of us know that hardly anybody reads and everybody just checks off the box. (Once, I watched my dad, a lawyer, check the box without reading. “It’s probably unenforceable,” he told me.)
But on this new Amex site, there’s a different implementation of this control. Sure, there’s a checkbox, but it’s grayed out. The only way to enable it for checking is to scroll to the bottom of the agreement.
The Amex Biz Travel site greys out the checkbox until the user scrolls to the bottom.
Now, as is also standard, the agreement is presented in a tiny little scrolling text box that shows about 200 words at a time. And, as is also standard, the agreement is a whopping 7,243 words (13 pages in a standard document) long.
Therefore, scrolling through this box takes a fair amount of effort. It’s unlikely that scrolling will encourage anyone to read the document. It’s just an extra hoop to jump through to continue the farce of pretending that the user has “read” whatever it is their agreeing to.
Apparently, the lawyers at Amex think that by having me scroll to the bottom, they can claim that I had every opportunity to read and agree to the terms. Therefore, if there’s something down the road I want to sue them about, I gave up that right with my scrolling action. (It’s unlikely any sensible judge will buy this argument, but it’s just as unlikely that any suit against them will get in front of a judge.)
Of course, the best way to do this would be to be honest with your users and treat them with respect. Amex could write the terms in simple language and give users a chance to really understand what they are agreeing to.
The problem with a design solution like the “scroll to agree” implementation is that it won’t be good enough. What happens when some other lawyer at Amex (or whereever) discovers that users don’t read it when they scroll to the bottom and therefore don’t understand what they are agreeing to? They’ll put in some other ridiculous control, where you’ll have to enter a secret code or recite poetry or something.
At some point, we, as designers, have to stand up and say, “This isn’t really doing what you think it’s doing. It’s just making our relationship with our users worse.” When do we do that?
I’d like to start now.
Dark_Patterns
Design_Patterns
User_Experience
from google
Now, these are often implemented with a checkbox that says something like “I have read and agree to the terms and conditions.” Most of us know that hardly anybody reads and everybody just checks off the box. (Once, I watched my dad, a lawyer, check the box without reading. “It’s probably unenforceable,” he told me.)
But on this new Amex site, there’s a different implementation of this control. Sure, there’s a checkbox, but it’s grayed out. The only way to enable it for checking is to scroll to the bottom of the agreement.
The Amex Biz Travel site greys out the checkbox until the user scrolls to the bottom.
Now, as is also standard, the agreement is presented in a tiny little scrolling text box that shows about 200 words at a time. And, as is also standard, the agreement is a whopping 7,243 words (13 pages in a standard document) long.
Therefore, scrolling through this box takes a fair amount of effort. It’s unlikely that scrolling will encourage anyone to read the document. It’s just an extra hoop to jump through to continue the farce of pretending that the user has “read” whatever it is their agreeing to.
Apparently, the lawyers at Amex think that by having me scroll to the bottom, they can claim that I had every opportunity to read and agree to the terms. Therefore, if there’s something down the road I want to sue them about, I gave up that right with my scrolling action. (It’s unlikely any sensible judge will buy this argument, but it’s just as unlikely that any suit against them will get in front of a judge.)
Of course, the best way to do this would be to be honest with your users and treat them with respect. Amex could write the terms in simple language and give users a chance to really understand what they are agreeing to.
The problem with a design solution like the “scroll to agree” implementation is that it won’t be good enough. What happens when some other lawyer at Amex (or whereever) discovers that users don’t read it when they scroll to the bottom and therefore don’t understand what they are agreeing to? They’ll put in some other ridiculous control, where you’ll have to enter a secret code or recite poetry or something.
At some point, we, as designers, have to stand up and say, “This isn’t really doing what you think it’s doing. It’s just making our relationship with our users worse.” When do we do that?
I’d like to start now.
october 2011 by alexhansford
Materials from the Web App Masters 2011 Tour Are Now Available
august 2011 by alexhansford
If you weren’t able to attend this year’s Web App Masters Tour, we have the next best thing for you and your organization: Web App Masters 2011 OnDemand.
This is your opportunity to hear all 12 Masters from the Tour give their 75-minute presentations. The OnDemand collection consists of 15 hours of audio recordings, Q&A from the audience, and the Masters presentation decks. It’s a toolkit that you can share with everyone in your office. You can access it any time you want, as often as you want.
Web App Masters OnDemand covers these topics
Constructing sites for active communities
Building native device vs. mobile browser-based applications
Producing beautiful data visualizations
Using data for design decisions
Integrating infographics and games to engage your users
Designing for mobile first
Handling rich interaction techniques on multiple devices & platforms
Looking at AARP’s journey into web-based applications
Conducting successful kickoff meetings
Finding users’ deepest needs and desires
Designing Salesforce.com’s Cloud Apps
Creating great design principles for your team
Ensuring a positive user experience with mobile
Learn more about Web App Masters OnDemand.
With Web App Masters 2011 OnDemand you’ll get
Fifteen hours of audio from 12 Masters
The best of the Q&A from all the tour stops
Presentation slides from all 12 talks
Unlimited access to the material any time you want it, as often as you want it
Order Web App Masters 2011 OnDemand now
No pre-ordering and no waiting for a disc. With just a few clicks, you can have Web App Masters OnDemand at your fingertips and start to improve your web apps today.
Purchase Web App Masters OnDemand by August 30, 2011, for $179. After the 30th, the price
increases to $229.
Now go get your bundle of goodness.
agile
Design_Patterns
Design_Principles
Design_Teams
Emotional_Engagement
mobile
Pattern_Libraries
User_Engagement
user_research
Web_App_Masters_Tour
Aviva_Rosenstein
Bill_Scott
data_visualization
Josh_Clark
Julie_Zhuo
Kate_Brigham._web_apps
luke_wroblewski
Mike_Lee
noah_iliinsky
Stephen_Anderson
Steve_Portigal
WAMT
Web_App_Masters_Tour_2011
from google
This is your opportunity to hear all 12 Masters from the Tour give their 75-minute presentations. The OnDemand collection consists of 15 hours of audio recordings, Q&A from the audience, and the Masters presentation decks. It’s a toolkit that you can share with everyone in your office. You can access it any time you want, as often as you want.
Web App Masters OnDemand covers these topics
Constructing sites for active communities
Building native device vs. mobile browser-based applications
Producing beautiful data visualizations
Using data for design decisions
Integrating infographics and games to engage your users
Designing for mobile first
Handling rich interaction techniques on multiple devices & platforms
Looking at AARP’s journey into web-based applications
Conducting successful kickoff meetings
Finding users’ deepest needs and desires
Designing Salesforce.com’s Cloud Apps
Creating great design principles for your team
Ensuring a positive user experience with mobile
Learn more about Web App Masters OnDemand.
With Web App Masters 2011 OnDemand you’ll get
Fifteen hours of audio from 12 Masters
The best of the Q&A from all the tour stops
Presentation slides from all 12 talks
Unlimited access to the material any time you want it, as often as you want it
Order Web App Masters 2011 OnDemand now
No pre-ordering and no waiting for a disc. With just a few clicks, you can have Web App Masters OnDemand at your fingertips and start to improve your web apps today.
Purchase Web App Masters OnDemand by August 30, 2011, for $179. After the 30th, the price
increases to $229.
Now go get your bundle of goodness.
august 2011 by alexhansford
related tags
agile ⊕ Aviva_Rosenstein ⊕ Bill_Scott ⊕ Dark_Patterns ⊕ data_visualization ⊕ Design_Patterns ⊕ Design_Principles ⊕ Design_Teams ⊕ Emotional_Engagement ⊕ Josh_Clark ⊕ Julie_Zhuo ⊕ Kate_Brigham._web_apps ⊕ luke_wroblewski ⊕ Mike_Lee ⊕ mobile ⊕ noah_iliinsky ⊕ Pattern_Libraries ⊕ Stephen_Anderson ⊕ Steve_Portigal ⊕ User_Engagement ⊕ User_Experience ⊕ user_research ⊕ WAMT ⊕ Web_App_Masters_Tour ⊕ Web_App_Masters_Tour_2011 ⊕Copy this bookmark: