'Can you have one without the other?'

'...Babylon's Religious Priesthood is commonly recognizable as the source of all of the modern so called "Laws of Commerce". These "Laws of Commerce" are shown to be a specific body of Codes which authorize the Administration of the Compelling Force of the State in the En-Force-ment of Contracts, mostly for Payments of Debts. The ancient Babylonian Priests were involved because Contracts were deemed to be a form of "Oath" entered into by the contracting parties; and the approval of their Gods were invoked so as to more effectively legitimize/bamboozle the entire process in the minds and the consciences of the contracting parties and all public witnesses. Under the ancient Babylonian Religious Codes, "Slavery" is clearly facilitated. People were not recognized as People but were items in Commerce. The text-book says that "The slave is not regarded or spoken of as a man, but as a thing, and is reckoned in the same way as cattle."' -- Nothing personal, Jack. It's just good business.

'This video allegedly shows how on May 12th, a Rochester woman was arrested for taping a traffic stop in front of her home.' -- (Woman: "This is my front yard... it's my right." -- Law: CONTROVERSY. There is no private property in THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.) -- Officer: "I'm going to ask you to..." -- Law: So, you haven't yet asked me to consider your offer, Officer? [OFFER-SIR] -- Officer: "I'm trying to give you an order..." -- Law: And would I be obliged to accept your offer of an order if you were to offer it, Officer? -- Woman: "I don't understand your order." (Law: No consent to acceptance of offers of orders has been given. However, property/proprietary controversy remains.) -- Officer: "I'm trying to give you a warning." Law: Are you offering me a warning, Officer? Am I obliged to accept your offer of a warning, Officer? -- Officer: "...this is not right." Law: Are you qualified to make that determination, Officer? What is your bond number for presentment at court?

'Hayes has embarked on an effort to legally prove that the enforced collection of council tax by government is unlawful because no contract has been agreed between the individual and the state. His argument is based on the sound legal principle that just like the council, Hayes can represent himself as a third party in court and that "Roger Hayes" is a corporation and must be treated as one in the eyes of the law. The British government doesn't want this kind of information going viral in the public domain because it is scared stiff of a repeat of the infamous poll tax riots of 1990, a massive tax revolt in the UK that forced the Thatcher government to scrap the poll tax altogether because of mass civil disobedience and refusal to pay. When viewers in the UK attempt to watch videos of the protest, they are met with the message, "This content is not available in your country due to a government removal request."' -- It is a fraud to conceal a fraud. (Maxims of Law)

'Own much?' -- None dare call it COMMUNISM.

'Protestors have "civilly arrested" a judge at Birkenhead county court. A crowd of several hundred people has massed around the court. Police have begun forcibly ejecting protestors from the court in chaotic scenes. Made up of people from across the UK, the marchers say they are exerting their "ancient right to lawful Rebellion under Magna Carta." The crowd, although largely peaceful, is chanting "freedom" and "arrest that judge."' -- If there is hope, wrote Winston, it lies in the proles.

'7 Reasons why Credit Card/Loan agreements are unlawful or why you don't owe your bank/credit card company anything: #Your Credit Card Agreement is an unlawful contract as it is ONLY signed by you – constituting a unilateral agreement. (Contract Law) #All contracts, in order to be valid, must be signed by someone able to bind the corporation in contract. (Contract Law) #You do not have to pay statements, only invoices. (Bills of Exchange Act 1882) #You are not lawfully bound to pay anything which is unsigned. (Bills of Exchange Act 1882) #The uppercase name on the credit card is not your name, but a 'corporate entity'. (Blacks Law Dictionary) #The governments are so desperate to keep this racket going, that they will bail out ANY bank that gets into trouble! Being in debt is one of the consequences of playing the game #There is not enough Money in circulation for everyone to pay off ALL the debts! #The whole system is totally fraudulent...' -- Prove it to yourself.

'Dominant Social Theme: These hackers are simply irresponsible. -- Free-Market Analysis: All of a sudden, as a result of Julian Assange's imprisonment, a dominant theme that we never expected to be challenged so soon is front and center. The idea of state monopoly justice has suddenly come under fire by a group of young hackers that are questioning how the state defines criminality. ...we believe that we are witnessing, therefore, yet another important turning point in the evolution of Internet technology. A meme (state monopoly justice), one we did not imagine would be much questioned for years to come, is right in the middle of the current news cycle and larger news conversation. Whether the it is controlled or not is almost beside-the-point. Larger issues are now on the table. We would anticipate over the next few years that the whole issue of Admiralty law will become a good deal more high-profile.'

"The first spell we were put under was our NAME."

"Things are different for my generation." -- #fail faster

"The judge has to influence the attorney on the other side to your benefit. You have to give tools to the judges that they can use."

'Dominant Social Theme: Please don't look at the man behind the curtain. -- The entire mechanism has been reborn as a public enterprise beholden to the elite. Teacher, lawyer, educator, accountant, doctor or military person – all are entangled in a quasi-public system beholden to government at almost every level (and many are aware of their unwitting complicity, even if they can't verbalize it). For those who seek to survive outside of the system, there are various intelligence agencies and other adversarial governmental institutions manufactured to make life difficult. -- The "silver lining" to all of this, if there is one, is that the truth-telling of the Internet has thoroughly upset the artificial construct – the all-encompassing monetary and professional matrix – that the elite created through money power in the 21st century. As we have written before, there is nothing more powerful than an idea whose time has come.'

"Who is liable for the name?"

'#(a) If a person acting, or purporting to act, as a representative signs an instrument by signing either the name of the represented person or the name of the signer, the represented person is bound by the signature to the same extent the represented person would be bound if the signature were on a simple contract. If the represented person is bound, the signature of the representative is the "authorized signature of the represented person" and the represented person is liable on the instrument, whether or not identified in the instrument. #(b) If a representative signs the name of the representative to an instrument and the signature is an authorized signature of the represented person, the following rules apply: #(1) If the form of the signature shows unambiguously that the signature is made on behalf of the represented person who is identified in the instrument, the representative is not liable on the instrument.' -- 2: If not shown unambiguously, representative/signer is liable.

'Like an affidavit, an un-rebutted Birth Certificate stands in commerce. The presumption is that all agree. He who creates the liability must also provide remedy for its discharge. ...statutes apply to ‘persons’ and not to flesh and blood men and women. (At least without their informed consent.) ...if man comes to a realization of who he really is, man and not THE NAME and informs government of same, then there should be zero resistance from government to the exit of that man from the system of commerce. Everything that exists and is created by man is legally owned by government either directly or indirectly by registration in THE NAME that government holds the rights and liabilities in. -- I do not hold the rights in THE NAME. Therefore, I cannot have the liabilities either. I didn’t create it. I can only control that which I create. Government created THE NAME. Government is liable. Keep your flesh and blood body separate [from] THE NAME at all times and the presumption is rebutted.'

'The Inner Temple holds the legal system franchise by license that bleeds Canada and Great Britain white, while the Middle Temple has license to steal from America. To have the Declaration of Independence recognized internationally, Middle Templar King George III agreed in the Treaty of Paris of 1783 to establish the legal Crown entity of the incorporated United States, referred to internally as the Crown Temple States (Colonies). States spelled with a capital letter 'S,' denotes a legal entity of the Crown. At least five Templar Bar Attorneys under solemn oath to the Crown, signed the American Declaration of Independence. This means that both parties were agents of the Crown. There is no lawful effect when a party signs as both the first and second parties. The Declaration was simply an internal memo circulating among private members of the Crown. Colonials rebelled at the usurious Crown taxes, and thus the Declaration of Independence was created to pacify the populace.'

'In the year 1215 the first of our constitutional rights were set down on paper, it was called the Magna Carta, this was basically an oath from the crown (King or Queen) to uphold the rights of the people... Now our ancestors were not daft, they knew there could be a problem one day if the crown became unjust, or turned into some sort of dictatorship, or parliament was acting against the people, or was full of corruption, or was not allowing the crown to keep its oath. So in article 61 of the Magna Carta it was written that if this ever happened you could petition the crown to sort out the crowns problem (or parliaments if it was them), the crown had 40 days to fix it or dissolve parliament. If in the 40 days nothing was fixed the petitioner could go into rebellion against the crown and parliament lawfully until the problem was resolved. Because our constitution cannot be repealed it is still valid law. ...none of us have ever sworn an oath to be in the navy and obey admiralty law...'

"We claim common law jurisdiction before we enter this vessel. Do we have an accord?" -- Err... Parlay?? -- "MAN OVERBOARD!!!" LOL

'In this video a Freeman-On-The-Land is interviewed by a Police Constable. The video shows the Freeman separating himself from the legal fiction (Straw Man). The Net result is that the Police Constable is interviewing the Birth Certificate which represents the Straw Man/Legal Fiction. In other words he has to ask the questions of the Piece of Paper as the Human Being cannot speak for the piece of Paper. The outcome of this was the Director of Public Prosecutions decided that it wasn't "in the public interest" to prosecute in this matter. I think in reality it was more likely that they looked at the statement from the piece of paper and realised that there was no way they would ever get the Human Being into a court. Please note that this video is NOT a reflection on the Police Constable in the video—he acquitted himself and is a credit to himself. If only all Police Officers were more like him.' -- Who is liable for the name, Officer? Are you willing to be liable for the name, Officer?

'Here we see Englsih Freemen standing in court as Lay Advisors to another Freemen. This is for a Council Tax Liability Order hearing in Cwmbran Magistrates Court in South Wales, There were 14 Freemen in attendance. The court was never convened as the Freemen never handed juridiction to magistrates or the clerk by standing up when ordered to do so and the magistrates never sat down. The magistrates twice abandoned the court (the ship) and it was the Freemen who called the Police and at one point the Lay advisor can clearly be heard calling attending Police Constables to arrest the magistrates for impersonating judges. There were many criminal acts committed this day by the company personnel (Magistrates, solictors, security and the clerk) and Police complaints are under way pending prosecutions for Fraud among other things. But for the real shocker of how these people think they are above the law ... Watch until the end!' -- Haha! WHO IS LIABLE FOR THE NAME?!

"Equitable estoppel applies to a contract created by fraud."

'...the more that people can get back to individual problem solving with or without third-party negotiators the better off civil society will be. We would argue that people have a right to enforce private copyright and patent claims IF THEY CAN. Ultimately we would suggest that people have a right to try to attach invisible strings to their IP. Who is to stop them after all? The enforcement, within the framework we are suggesting, would amount to a kind of intense market competition. Reducing, or even eliminating, the resources and involvement of the state in judicial and civil matters as much as possible, would put the onus of enforcement on the individual. Much of what passes for "justice" today might suddenly be seen as too expensive to insist upon, once it was up to the individual. For us, issues of private justice, a return to common law and even pre-common law problem solving, even regarding so-called criminal issues, is part of creating a freer and more market-oriented society.'

'When it comes to copyright, we would argue for private justice... If someone wants to sue an individual or group for "stealing" intellectual property, the person should be able to do so. But there is no need for state laws or international treaties regarding the matter. ... This would mean that only very large commercial enterprises would end up being sued. Nobody would bother with individuals downloading files, etc. This is probably as it should be. Legal injury should follow natural law. What is "yours" is mostly what you can protect: your family, your property, etc. But launch a book or article into the world and protecting it becomes a good deal more arbitrary and difficult. We would argue that successful artists can still make a living even were intellectual property rights enforced privately rather than through statist mechanisms. Sure, it would be a less efficient and merciless system. People would pilfer songs and articles and even books. But so what? They do it anyway.'

'The constitution not only binds nobody now, but it never did bind anybody. It never bound anybody, because it was never agreed to by anybody in such a manner as to make it, on general principles of law and reason, binding upon him. -- It is a general principle of law and reason, that a written instrument binds no one until he has signed it. The laws holds, and reason declares, that if a written instrument is not signed, the presumption must be that the party to be bound by it, did not choose to sign it, or to bind himself by it. And law and reason both give him until the last moment, in which to decide whether he will sign it, or not. The fact that the instrument was written for him to sign, or with the hope that he would sign it, goes for nothing. Where would be the end of fraud and litigation, if one party could bring into court a written instrument, without any signature, and claim to have it enforced, upon the ground that it was written for another man to sign?'

Dear America, -- 'Yet again and again, throughout your speech, you repeat the idea, that this so-called constitution, which nobody ever signed, which few people ever read, which the great body of the people never saw, and about whose meaning no two persons ever agreed, is “The Supreme Law of this Land!” Sir, where did this wonderful constitution come from, that you should describe it as “The Supreme Law of this Land?” Did it originate with any body who had any rightful authority to impose it upon the people of this country? Sir, this declaration of yours, that the constitution (so-called) is “the Supreme Law of this Land,” is utterly, flagrantly, shamefully false. Justice alone is the Supreme Law of this land, and of all other lands. And it is not because your “Supreme Law of the Land,” the constitution – but because the supreme law of justice is “neglected,” “forgotten,” “disregarded,” and “disobeyed,” that our liberty is lost; or, rather, never had an existence.'

'Establishing the right to act as Peace Officers.'

'Better Well-Read than Dead?' -- None dare call it.

How to access your communist (commonwealth) account.

#Fraud lies hid in general expressions. #It is a fraud to conceal a fraud. #Once a fraud, always a fraud. #What otherwise is good and just, if it be sought by force and fraud, becomes bad and unjust. #He is not deceived who knows himself to be deceived. #Let him who wishes to be deceived, be deceived. #The propriety of words is the safety of property.

Is there any proof I am bound by such a contract, Officer? Am I obliged to sign a social contract, Officer? Under whose authority and under what law?

'I ask Assange how he defines national security. ''We don't,'' he says crisply. "We're not interested in that. We're interested in justice. We are a supranational organisation. So we're not interested in national security.'' -- Did being arrested, and later on finding himself in a courtroom, push him into a completely different reality that he had never thought about - and eventually in a direction that eventually saw him start thinking along the lines of a website like Wikileaks, that would take on the world? ''That [experience] showed me how the justice system and bureaucracy worked, and did not work; what its abilities were and what its limitations were,'' he replies. ''And justice wasn't something that came out of the justice system. Justice was something that you bring to the justice system. And if you're lucky, or skilled, and you're in a country that isn't too corrupt, you can do that.'''

Amazon ASIN: B00262W3ZA

You have to charge an account or the instrument you AFV doesn't have any value. A tax has been fully assessed, it's a known value. It doesn't need to be charged. We create paper to justify the use of force (energy/charge). And so a piece of paper that has no charge associated with it cannot transfer energy because it has no force behind it. A tax, however, has been properly assessed and they have charged the strawman account for that amount. The IRS acting as debt collector for the IMF has already charged that account. So all you have to do is accept and return [the tax demand] to them. -- Gives overview of AFV your strawman birth certificate, charging it to the strawman account at the treasury, who will in turn use it to access the foreign situs trust held at the IMF that had been created by the application for live berth (see videos 1a and 1b). Now any presentment or judgement can be sent to the treasury requesting they use the situs trust to pay it.

Your acceptance/signature/credit turns the coupon/remittance/instrument/document into currency. -- A tax is fully charged. A bill is void of charges. You have to charge a bill by accepting it for value; you charge it to the party who created the bill, because once it's charged, the interest can be returned to the principal. [A charged/accepted/signed bill re-presents interest (tax) on the principal (the debt loaned to bankrupt governments) that cannot be discharged. -- Bill e.g. Criminal Justice Bill. Cybersecurity Bill. -- Bills signed/accepted/charged into acts (fictions) of 'law' -- 'law' enforcement = debt collection [?]]

I owe no debt to JOHN SMITH. Said account having been adjusted in public policy to zero balance. There is no evidence to the contrary. I do not believe any evidence exists. The record is made and uncompromised. I therefore deny being subject to the jurisdiction of the UNITED STATES (etc) or any UNITED STATES vessels (etc) -- In the public, you have to expressly waive benefit/privilege -- you have to say so and do so. -- Whoever creates the liability must bring the remedy. -- Blue ink: When you sign something, you add credibility to it. -- Accepted For Value: Anyone who sends a bill, but doesn't also send a cheque to pay the bill, has created a liability in the public (in bankruptcy) without providing remedy. -- A coupon/remittance is a cheque. Accept it as valuable: write across it: "Accepted for value. Exempt from levy." Provide exemption ID number (your SIN/social insurance number). "Deposit to the treasury and charge to [your PERSON's] account." Sign and date. Send to the treasury.

When they ask if you understand your rights, they're trying to get you to waive your rights, not secure them to yourself. "I waive none of my rights." -- As a citizen (of the ship), you are required to inform on yourself. If you are a citizen you cannot refuse to identify yourself. You have to overcome the presumption that you are a citizen and have accepted and are using citizen benefit/privileges. "I waive the benefits and privileges of citizenship." -- ["What's YOUR name? What makes you think I have a name? Am I obliged to have a name? Do you have any evidence that I am a citizen?"] -- Anytime you give your name, you are contracting with someone, you have given them a lien against your property. -- You can't be held in contempt of court if you're only asking questions. Ask for the names of all the parties in court. -- Reads: 'Affidavit of Status regarding Citizenship' ... I, a stranger to the public trust, hereby waive the breach of contract commited by the united States... [Hmm]

If you don't want the benefit/privilege, waive it. "I waive the payment of the fine. I waive the sentence of a term in prison." You don't have to absolve your sin/debt, so just waive the court's offers. Nobody can force you to accept a benefit/privilege. Benefits and privileges are voluntary. If they are forced, it's involuntary servitude.

The person (JOHN SMITH) vs the GOV'T with the man (John Smith) as third party to the person with real interest. Put an indemnity bond (birth cert.) into the court to protect the judge and so protect the public. John Smith has a proprietary right to JOHN SMITH. John Smith is the only real party and interest acting as contributing beneficiary who has put any value into JOHN SMITH. John Smith is the only legitimate party to any equity attached to JOHN SMITH (enc. UCC-1 Financing Statement. John Smith is entitled to any interpleative funds relating to JOHN SMITH. Therefore, Respondant denies that the Claimant has any proprietary right to JOHN SMITH. Respondant denies the Claimant has put any value into JOHN SMITH. Notwithstanding any assumed contracts [...] the Claimant is in breach of any such alleged contract for failure of consideration. Claimant is barred from any collection of any alleged debt from JOHN SMITH or related to JOHN SMITH, the Claimant having no claim in fact.

Social Security Insurance is limited liability insurance provided by the government. When you work in commerce [as a common law man?], you work with full liability, man-to-man. Because we're in bankruptcy, because you use the 'king's' current-sea, the king will always assert his right in equity as the third party. To stop this, deny the assumption that you use the currency with a negative averment. File a deposition, depose yourself, remove yourself from the civil government. Notify the other party and write out the questions (and answers) for the notary/attorney to ask you, leaving the other party (an Attorney) with no opportunity for rebuttal other than a first-hand witness. [You can do this at any time with an Affidavit or Statutory Declaration under the Statutory Declarations Act 1835?] That's not my signature. What number didn't you hear? Waive both sides of the court benefits: claim and counter-claim. Get the paperwork into the Judge's evidence file.

First in time/first in line, establishes lien position. The UCC-1 is just the notice that the lien exists. You need to have the lien. -- Appearing in a corporate court... You do not have to be surety, you can appear by special, limited appearance: "I, appearing as WINSTON SHROUT..." When you sign something, you want to limit your signature: 'By: <Winston Shrout> (Agent)' – a conditional signature. 'Winston Shrout, Real Party and Interest.' It is the custom in admiralty that a man can sue in his real name – you don't *have* to use a strawman. -- Third-party, counter-claim countermeasures... You can always name the government as the third-party Defendent because they are Constitutor for all the citizen's debts. The principle: 'however does business with my Debtor becomes my Debtor', means you can put anyone who is a common stock owner of the gov't as a third-party Defendent. All government vessels operate in limited liability insurance, all profit in commerce comes from insurance fraud.

The purpose of summonsing you (your person) to court is anything in admiralty jurisdiction, they went a sued a vessel knowing that owner will eventually show up and ask why their vessel has been held in port. They arrest the vessel using a bill of exchange (negotiable instrument) as the arrest warrant. They hold the vessel in port so that it can't do commerce. When the owner shows up at court and proves they are the surety for vessel [with their bond?], the ownder becomes the surety for the negotiable instrument and the court orders the port to release the vessel back to sea. On the UCC-1 financing statement... Commerce is all about lien - what lien position are you in? Properly executed, you can put yourself into first lien position.

On Bills of Exchange (debt notes) as the admiralty replacement for asset money. Civil Law/Statutes is all merchant law. A complaint that is put into court is a negotiable instrument, it's a bill of exchange. Courts only deal in debt, the money damage of a crime. The jury helps the Judge determine how much the Defendant will pay for the crime. Maker/Drawer (the Attorney of the BAR, operating on the letter of marque, making a gamble/wager on the prize of the negotiable instrument on the open sea), Drawee (the party who is named as the Defendant (the Person)), Payor (indeterminate until the wager pays off where a party is assigned to be surety, else the Attorney gets stuck with the bill), Payee (the State, the holder and issuer of the Attorney's bond). A Defendant's plea of 'not guilty' is a counter claim against the Plaintiff that requires a bond. No bond, no standing. And if you've gone into court with an Attorney who is already bonded, the State will be the beneficiary if you win.

On the Garden of Eden as the world of Common Law... God sent Adam and Eve out of the garden into maritime juristidiction for disobeying his commandment having been tricked by the Serpent. They were put into a reorganisation bankruptcy (SIN = DEBT). Because there's no mercy in common law, God had to send them out into a changed system of law: admirality. Had he not, he would have had to destroy them. -- Because Jesus' blood was taken early, his convenant provided for a pre-paid system. DEBT/SIN/the bite of the Serpent could set-off (not discharged and thus put off into the future) via the pre-payment provided for people if only they would "look up" and accept their remedy via their bond certificate.

'The story of how everyone has a strawman created for them at birth and how it is used to collect revenue for your government.' -- http://infomaticfilms.com

"They cannot enforce a statute upon you without your consent because [without a bond, you have] no guarantee that it won't harm you. To use a statute is a benefit/privilege *you* are asking for because it does not belong to you. Probably most of the statutes you might be dealing with are not bonded and so you do not have to give them any credibility at all unless you want to. If *you* want to use unbonded statutes and codes then *you* go and bond it – because if you bond it, now whose statute is it? -- If you go to the archivist and get a certified copy of the statute it'll be on bond paper – accept it as a creditor – and now you have the bond, turn it into the court as payment. -- Anything that floats around on the sea of commerce that doesn't have a flag on it is fair game for prize."

A little on being tricked into giving power of attorney to a corporation to access your prepay account.

On the need for a dummy Strawman with a surety bond: "When a man comes into the public, it is as if God was coming into the public, and so the public has to be shielded from the countenance of God – or the man – because the public operates in fraud. A man is not capable of fraud. And so when you get involved with the public, you need to keep a veil over your face."

2+2=5 scream: "But what about the 'social contract'???!!!"

'Common Law is codified cultural and moral experience, socially accepted and applied on a case by case basis by a private/communal judiciary of some sort. -- Common Law: #resolution-based with no concept of "debt to society" #social canon of "law" codified by tradition #punishments customized to crime by simple resolution techniques #private resolution whenever possible #simple private or communal courts when necessary (as in early Britain) #precedent observed but informally and as suitable #shame based punishments preferred to incarceration #no obvious distinction between civil and criminal law -- Modern Western Law #control by the state #emphasis on "debt to society" (society remains undefined?) [Law Society] #private prison industry complex benefits from incarceration-intensive punishments #lavish celebration of precedent #elaborate appeals system #no ability to seek private redress #adversarial model with middle man (attorney) emphasized #distinction between civil and criminal law'

'Under the common law, two parties to a dispute are required to communicate the grievance and attempt to settle privately before going public with the dispute. If private settlement cannot be made, then they agree to abide by the decision of the arbiters that they both choose. At that agreement, peace is made, though the underlying grievance has not yet been justified until trial. Peace is accomplished swiftly, and the parties can go back to both productivity and leisure. Under an adversarial system, the parties are discouraged from communicating directly, but do so through a third party who has an interest in keeping the conflict alive, since only in litigation can the attorney benefit. Civil law is designed to foment and perpetuate conflict for the purpose of controlling people and obtaining their wealth (energy). For that reason the power elite have obscured every attempt of the people to utilize principles of law, and to teach those principles to others.'

'The sensible focus of common law involves private, marketplace justice and allows aggrieved parties to solve both civil and criminal offenses on their own using the standards of community morality. This sort of justice is not based on precedent but on common sense and tends to limit quarrels and even violence. Precedent justice, combined with the West's modern-day prison-industrial complex, will inevitably give rise to a web of complex criminal and civil "laws" that will continually expand over time. Unlike common law, the precedent-based legal system can only multiply its "laws" until almost everything can be considered a prosecutable action. The end result is an oppressive and impossibly complex system good for intimidation and control. -- As the current monetary system continues its unrolling collapse, we expect the worst excesses of the current statist judiciary to begin to retreat as well.'

'Common law systems of justice thrive when the state is less than omnipresent and when private morality and religion [*sigh*] have expanded into the gap left by the diminishment of the authoritarian state. ...such systems tend to be "shame-based" rather than punitive in terms of Western approaches. Rather than vast periods of incarceration, the convicted individual is subject to punishments that may be psychologically painful, yet far less expensive and disruptive. ...in terms of competitive justice that is privately based and arises to solve problems cleanly and efficiently, the West's vast law libraries and universities are manifestations of the larger regulatory democracies that have taken hold in the 20th century. These democracies, in turn, are an outgrowth of mercantilist central banking and fiat money. Only societies with huge amount of paper money to fling about can afford the kinds of litigious, statist and authoritarian justice system that is prevalent today.'

'This is the updated version of the same video about how I responded to a recent court summons. You can do this to just about each & every court summons you may receive. It's important to always respond in writing. Also, it's recommended for you to go to a notary public to have your written response documented and notarized for proof.' -- Thank you for your notice. I decline your invitation to attend your court/bank and I decline your offer of contract to represent a corporation so as to assist you with your bankruptcy book-keeping. I remain in honour and good standing under law.

Comment: Pat Fields: '@George Sign Cite: "I can never quite get my head around the ownership of land." -- Title in anything is a duality ... At Law and In Equity. These are separable aspects and must be understood to clearly understand the paramount evil in artificial 'money' within the Common Law system. Plantation Scrip ["money"] entitles possession At Law, but since it is purely credit, it can not acquire title In Equity (beneficial ownership). Since government assumes authority of [Surety], it defends legal possession 'unless a superior title can be presented at bar'. That conversely authorizes it to defend the beneficial rights of Holders In Equity ... which it does through taxation on the land.'

'Lying and collusion have become so systemic that every decision made drives us towards a dangerously wrong result. These decisions are leading us down the path to breakdown collapse. We want to turn the tide, so how do we effect change.' -- You withdraw 'moral' support for government and every other form of organized violence – NOW – before the suicidal parasites fully consume their hosts.

'Lawyer Capitalism = LAWCAP. LAWCAP's "capitalism" is paradoxically the most highly socialized organization in all history.'

'An indepth discussion into who you really are.' -- All aboard the citizen ship!

'... Since all these debt-notes are out there as “the debt”, in the “public”, this means that we are the cause of the “public debt” which must be offset. But, what we are told is that the public debt must be “paid” and, of course, this is an impossibility because if we ‘pay’ ‘public debt’ with ‘debt’, all that occurs is that we double the debt. The only way out of this mess is for us to do whatever it takes to remove the debt-notes, aka ‘cash’, aka ‘the debt’ from the public. For a long time, we thought that we had to offset the public debt, but the public debt has not been caused by anything other than our having put cash where it not only doesn’t belong and cannot be used in any productive manner but also is creating havoc with the economy. Now that we know that we must get the debt out of the public, so that there is no more ‘public debt’, how do we recall the trillions of dollars of debt? We call in the biggest, best, most-efficient debt collectors in the world: the IRS.'

Comment: Bruce: 'I doubt any loan nowadays is made with full disclosure that the borrower is also the party who provides the funds which are loaned to him by extension of the borrower's credit to the lending institute. It's time to shut down formalized fraud practices of the Banks/ Bancs. Check Black's Fifth Law Dictionary. Bank/banc is a court, also the bench of authority. The American legal system is based upon investments in (attachments to) the title of the people's right to liberty, thereby subjecting them to Baal/bail. Where a debt is also currency, upon being placed upon the books of a Court (arraigned) the Court/Bank has immediate cash to invest in the stock market. Arraignment is agreement to be placed upon the books of the Court/Bank as a debtor, at which time an account/case is opened in your name.'

'TOP SECRET BANKER'S MANUAL - FOR BANKERS ONLY - This manual is designed for Bank Presidents and Vice Presidents only. *Do not allow lower level bank employees to review.* -- (This manual is for educational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice.)' -- More info: http://www.bankdebt.org / http://www.bankdebt.org/ts2002.mp3

Draft reply/rant to a bank explaining the loan/credit card fraud: '...providing you had actually 'lent' this money from your own funds and had not taken my cheque [signed loan/credit application] cashed it with the treasury who took the money from my [treasury] account gave it back to you and you then gave it back to me as an alleged loan and asked for the principal back and charged enormous amounts of interest on it to boot...'

Comment: DB: Bruce -- 'Get kidnaped on the street by jack booted thugs in uniform carrying a badge. They bring you into an executive branch administrative court before someone called a judge, who is merely a clerk for the police agency who kidnaped you. They pretend the whole thing is judicial, but it isn't. Then they ask you questions, like, 'What's your name? or 'Are you So and So? Let me ask you this, 'If whoever brought me here can't testify to who I am and why he brought me here, then by what authority do you hold me and ask me questions? If asked, 'What's your name? my response is, 'What makes you think I have a name? You wouldn't believe how fast the hands come off from me. The word 'name comes from the Latin word 'Nome which means 'debtor. The question, 'What's your name? actually is the question, 'Do you recognize me as the creditor so that I can determine how much money I can extract from you today? There is no honesty in government. There is no law in the courts.'

'You are presumed to know the law. THEY know you don't know the law, or your history for that matter, because this information has not been taught to you. No concerted effort has been made to inform you. As a Sovereign, you are entitled to full disclosure of the facts. As a slave, you are entitled to nothing other than what the corporation decides to "give" you — at a price. Ignorance of the law is not considered an excuse. It is your responsibility and your obligation as an American to learn about the law and how it applies to you. THEY count on the fact that most people are too uninterested or distracted or lazy to do so. The People have been mentally conditioned to allow the alleged government to do their thinking for them. The UNITED STATES government is basically a corporate instrument of the international bankers. This means YOU are owned by the corporation from birth to death. -- US CODE: Title 28,3002. Definitions (15) "United States" means — (A) a Federal corporation;'

"A dark-haired girl shows up at the door of the protagonist and tells him that his [word] is delusional." -- We are living in a word-programmed reality and whenever one word is changed an alternative reality branches off.

WAKE UP.

"Due to the bankruptcies, the governments had to capture the future labour and productivity of the people because they no longer had the gold and silver to pay the international bankers interest on their loans. The people would *create* the interest; the governments would create numerous commercial legal statutes and taxes with which to gather the interest and pay the debts. The best way for them to charge people with violations of statutes was by having women register their babies names as a corporation [thus tricking people into operating in commerce by associating their given corporate legal fiction name with their commonly-known-as name]. -- Now many people are very careful to say they are a man or woman 'born' on the land, that the 'authorities' have no jurisdiction or authority over me because I wasn't 'birthed' on water I'm of the land over which you have no authority unless I grant you it."

"People are going to start obeying [the banksters'] commercial code, because we're going to stick *them* to it. So the system will start running smoothly and there won't be all these people with no 'money' losing their houses because we now know how to 'pay' off the banks by telling them, 'Hey, you stole *my* credit – not the other way round.' Everything was in place for the system to work properly, but what happened was, we got some rogue agents in there who convinced people that everyone has to 'earn' their living and 'pay' their way – and it simply isn't true. These grubby little bankers just simply had a scathingly brilliant idea on how to enslave the people of the planet. -- Will the system implode? Well, they [the international bankers] might not go down nicely, they might fight [start wars] to the bitter end. But once enough of us catch on, they'll have to start behaving themselves and people who are in positions of enforcement are going to catch on they've been duped too."

"Because a regular store clerk wouldn't understand us if we tried to collect goods without paying, what we should be doing is giving them cash AND handing them a copy of certain forms that state who is issuing the credit (you) along with a voucher which authorises payment from your treasury account and includes the store's tax identification number. Once received, the treasury will set off the store's debt for them. And because the tax authorites know the store's debt has been offset for them, they also know the store has this extra cash (yours) which they shouldn't have. That's what a tax return is for: It's for you to claim back that over- 'paid' cash. The purpose of the tax authorities is to track down what we have put into the public and get it back for us. But nobody knows this; everyone has been programmed in school that they have to pay for everything and certain tricksters have realised that our signatures create credit and they've been stealing it from us."

"We're supposed to be working for our fellow man, not in corporations. Yes, the corporations do supply us with goods, but it was *our* value that funded the manufacture because we have birth certificates which the government used to create a bond – backed by *our* future labour and productivity – in order to create the credit to fund the manufacture of whatever it is the corporations sell. We should be able to collect whatever it is we want without paying because – we've already paid for it. What happened was, in the '30s, mothers were obliged to register their babies' births with the gov't thus creating a corporation named after each child and giving each unlimited credit. They were betting that over the child's lifetime they would pay the gov't far more in taxes, fines and applications than they would ever pay the child. Governments did this because they needed each child's value in order to pay off the national debt to the international bankers. The trick was, they didn't tell us."

"We're supposed to be setting off public debt with our signature and using money for private transactions between you and me. Whenever we put our labour in the form of cash (debt notes), we're actually obstructing the bankruptcy; we're doing it wrong. When a store presents you with a bill (which they tend not to do anymore) what we're supposed to be able to do is simply sign for it, thereby claiming it, and giving them access to what's called a 'treasury account' so that we can let the treasury know to offset that store's debt. All we're doing by signing the bill is saying, I'm authorising the treasury to balance your accounts for you, because I now know you have a debt. So for us to pay with our cash, our labour, is actually increasing the debt – it's doubling it, because the amount is the same. When the store gives you a receipt which shows you that you paid with cash – this did not set off their debt, it just increased the problem because we gave them [taxable] debt notes."

"Nobody in the Western world is operating under law and everything we think of as 'laws' are not laws, they're statutes, codes, rules, regulations, ordinances, bylaws, constitutions, and legislations. They don't have anything to do with us, they are simply the policies of the corporations which appear to be governments, but they're not. Let me use the USG as an example. The United States 'government' is just a slick corporation – a private, foreign, belligerent corporation – which happened to be crafty enough to call itself THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, but it has nothing to do with what we think of the country called the United States of America, nor is it a government, it's simply a corporation. And people actually think they're going to march to the polls and 'elect' a President of this corporation. -- They [the globalists] did away with the common law and they instituted the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) which are 'laws' under which we operate in commerce."

"We are operating in a state of bankruptcy. Every country in the world when it failed to pay back its debt to the IMF had to declare bankruptcy because the banks had collected all the gold and silver, doing away with anything with which we could use to pay any debt. So the alleged 'governments' (these countries do not have governments – we have de facto (without lawful authority), not de jure (with lawful authority) governments) said, 'Well, seeing as you can't pay your debts anymore because we've withdrawn all the gold and silver and we're in bankruptcy (but we're not telling you that), we will pay your debts for you.' But although they designed a remedy, they decided not to tell us because it would behoove the banks to control the people of the world, enslaving them by stealing their labour and their lives. So people [still] believed they had to pay for things and they don't. They've programmed us into believing we have to pay for things we need and want. And it simply isn't true."

"How did she get the credits in the first place?"

"How is it extortion, Sir?? How is it a threat?! Hang on, let me get my manager."

'Novation is a term used in contract law and business law to describe the act of either replacing an obligation to perform with a new obligation, or replacing a party to an agreement with a new party. In contrast to an assignment, which is valid so long as the obligee (person receiving the benefit of the bargain) is given notice, a novation is valid only with the consent of all parties to the original agreement: the obligee must consent to the replacement of the original obligor with the new obligor. A contract transferred by the novation process transfers all duties and obligations from the original obligor to the new obligor.'

'This version of this statute is extracted from the UK Statute Law Database (SLD). It is not necessarily in the form in which it was originally enacted but is a revised version, which means that any subsequent amendments to the text and other effects are incorporated with annotations.'

"Our client has declined your offer to buy new credits for a dollar each. She wanted to stop her addiction."

'A simple explanation of "alleged credit card debt' with one of the many debt collectors that we love talking with. We are here to help relieve stress and share self empowering information. Alleged debt resolution is only one of many services we offer.' -- LOL