talking to your audience and talking to your opponent.  The optimal balance might not be 50/50 exactly, but you should spend a goodly amount of time both appealing directly to your opponent, and pointing out his blind spots.

wed any sign of damage to the nasal tissue. Further vindicating the viruses themselves was

I've found this thread extremely useful. Currently, I am working to organize a web-based peer review system (with interactive manuscript reader). Our organization was considering a number of variations on an Open Review system. What suggestions can you make to increase the fruitfulness of this endeavor?

Posted by: Paul Allen at Feb 6, 2007 4:20:48 PM